【11.07.20 新闻周刊】中国有资格用默多克丑闻来抨击西方吗
【中文标题】中国有资格用默多克丑闻来抨击西方吗？（文中有提到AC）
【原文标题】China Bashes the West for Murdoch Scandal
【登载媒体】新闻周刊
【原文作者】Isaac Stone Fish
【原文链接】http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/20/rupert-murdoch-scandal-chinese-media-criticize-western-press-freedom.html
中国的媒体正在利用默多克丑闻来批评西方所谓的媒体自由。但是，根据Isaac Stone Fish的报道，中国媒体似乎并没有资格这样做。
就在英国反对党领袖Ed Miliband说鲁伯特默多克具有“危险的”政治影响力的第二天，中国新华社发表了一篇文章，题为“从默多克的‘窃听门’丑闻看西方媒体”，文章痛斥西方社会不道德的媒体行为，说西方媒体是建立在“侵犯公民权力”的基础上。当默多克把英国所有报纸的广告位买下，为《世界新闻报》所犯的错误道歉时，上海共产党的报纸《解放日报》说：“‘新闻自由’曾经是西方媒体自我标榜的道德标准，但是现在却遭到了全世界每一个国家人民的质疑，因为（西方媒体）对法律和道德越来越缺少起码的尊重。”共产党的官方喉舌《人民日报》也加入了声讨的队伍，说：“西方媒体其实并不关心社会道德。”天啊！香港大学记者和媒体研究中心主任Ying Chan说：“事件不断的升级似乎暴露了西方媒体的腐败，这对新闻自由不是一个小的打击。”
北京一直对与糟糕的新闻报道环境和新闻监察制度有关的指责表现得很敏感。它的回应是，严格的新闻监察机构和共产党发布的“指导意见”是必要的，这有助于在目前中国发展阶段保持社会稳定，而且它在逐渐开放。国际观察人士却不这么认为。记者无国界组织在2010年的新闻自由排名中，把中国列为第171位，与也门和苏丹为伍，比去年的排名更低。独立观察机构“自由之屋”在2010年的新闻自由报告中说：“中国依然是媒体受限最多的国家之一。”中国的国外记者俱乐部（FCCC）在5月份进行了一次调查，参与调查的记者中，94％认为工作环境比去年更加恶化；99％认为在中国做新闻报道无法达到国际标准。（我其实也是FCCC的成员，但没有参加调查。）
默多克报纸的非法行径陆续真相大白。一位中国媒体评论人士Michael Anti说：“这是中国媒体批判西方媒体的虚伪行径的绝佳时机。”一旦西方媒体再批评中国媒体虚假报道和其宣传控制机制时，普通中国读者就会想到：“可是西方媒体也是一样肮脏不堪”。新华社的文章夸夸其谈：“美国政府总是吹嘘‘新闻自由’，在2005年被爆出伊拉克战争的‘预制新闻’丑闻……这些事情在西方社会是屡见不鲜的。”
查塔姆研究所的中国社会问题专家Yiyi Lu说，中国媒体“只要一有机会，就会强烈关注西方媒体存在的问题”。2008年西藏发生暴乱时，西方媒体错误地使用了一张尼泊尔警察暴行的照片，这在中国网络上掀起了轩然大波。因此产生了Anti-CNN组织，其使命是反对“西方媒体的谎言和对事实的扭曲”。昨天，Anti-CNN发表了一篇文章，题目是“世界新闻报的丑闻在西方媒体自由的脸上抽了一记响亮的耳光”。
Ying说，默多克丑闻不仅关乎媒体道德，还是政府与媒体、执法部门的合谋，以及媒体权力高度集中现象的产物。英文版的政府报纸《中国日报》在昨天发表评论员文章，说：“在英国，默多克的新闻集团独自掌控了所有报刊发行量的37％……对西方媒体高度集中问题的深入调查对全世界人民都是一个福音。”
如果本地的评论人士把默多克的垄断行为与共产党在媒体和安全机制中无所不及的触角相提并论，中国的媒体政策机构肯定要起身反击。到目前为止，似乎只有香港报纸《南华早报》做了这样的比较。其文章写道，对大陆人来说“这样的做法太熟悉了”。只不过犯罪分子变成了“无所不在的便衣警察和刑警，他们伺机窥探任何不同政见者，和那些敢于探究不符合政治方向的新闻的记者们。” Ying说，尽管中国依然存在对新闻报道的压制现象，但是这里的媒体“持相当积极乐观的态度”。或许现在该把镜子转向自己了。
原文：
In China, the media are using the Murdoch scandal to criticize Western freedom of the press. But, as Isaac Stone Fish reports, the Chinese media are in no position to cast stones.
The day after British opposition leader Ed Miliband called Rupert Murdoch’s political influence “dangerous,” Chinese press agency Xinhua ran an article entitled “Looking at Western Media from Murdoch’s ‘Tapping-Gate’ Scandal,” castigating Western societies for their unethical reporting behavior and faulting the Western press establishment for “infringing on citizens’ rights.” When Murdoch took out advertisements in newspapers across Britain to apologize for News of the World’s wrongdoings, the Shanghai Communist Party newspaper Liberation Daily wrote that “‘freedom of the press,’ once seen as a standard in Western media, is now being widely doubted by citizens from every country because of the wanton growth of disregard of laws or morals.” The official mouthpiece of the Communist Party, the People’s Daily, dived into the debate, saying “actually, Western media doesn’t care about social morality.” Ouch. “The spin on these stories seems to be the corruption of Western media,” says Ying Chan, director of the Journalism and Media Studies Centre at Hong Kong University. “It is a not so subtle attack on the freedom of the press.”
Beijing has long bristled at criticism of its poor reporting conditions and press censorship. In response, it argues that its repressive media apparatus and the “guidance” the Communist Party provides are necessary to maintain social stability in China’s current stage of development, and that it’s gradually becoming more open. International observers disagree. Media advocacy group Reporters Without Borders ranked China at 171st in its Press Freedom Index in 2010, sandwiched between Yemen and Sudan and lower than the previous year; independent watchdog Freedom House said in its 2010 report on press freedom that “China’s media environment remained one of the world’s most restrictive.” A survey conducted by The Foreign Correspondents Club of China in May reported that 94 percent of journalists who responded thought the work environment had deteriorated over the last year; 99 percent said reporting in China doesn’t meet international standards. (Disclosure: I’m a board member of the FCCC, though I wasn’t at the time of the survey.)
As allegations of illegal acts by Murdoch’s papers continue to surface, “this is the perfect time for Chinese media to criticize Western media for its hypocrisy,” says Michael Anti, a Chinese media commentator. When Western media criticizes Chinese media for its sham reporting or its propaganda, an average Chinese reader could be led to think “well, Western media is also very rotten,” says Anti. The Xinhua article crows “the American government that always bragged about ‘press freedom’ was revealed in 2005 to ‘prefabricate news’ during the Iraq War… all that stuff is a common occurrence in Western societies.”
Chinese media draw attention to “the problems of Western media whenever there is an opportunity,” says Yiyi Lu, a Chatham House fellow and an expert on Chinese civil society. When riots shook Tibet in 2008, a photo of police brutality in Nepal wrongly attributed to the Chinese caused widespread anger in the Chinese blogosphere, and inspired the founding of the group Anti-CNN, created to counter “the lies and distortions of facts from the Western media.” Yesterday, Anti-CNN published a story entitled “‘The News of the World’ Scandal Gives Western Media Freedom a Big Slap in the Face.”
The Murdoch scandal is not just about media ethics, but the collusion of the government, media, and law enforcement and the concentration of media power, says Ying. An editorial published yesterday in the English-language government newspaper China Daily argued “In Britain, Murdoch's News Corporation alone owns 37 percent of the newspaper circulation… a check on the Western media concentration would be a blessing to people worldwide.”
China’s media strategy could backfire if domestic commentators start likening Murdoch’s monopoly to the Communist Party’s deep-reaching tentacles into the media and security apparatus. So far, it appears that only Hong Kong-based newspaper South China Morning Post drew that comparison, writing that “the tactics sound too familiar” to mainlanders, except that for them the perpetrators are “the omnipresent internal security police or the state security agents trying to snoop on any political dissent or any journalist daring to probe for politically incorrect stories.” Despite an ongoing crackdown in China, "there is a very upbeat atmosphere" in the media here, says Ying. Perhaps it's time for the mirror to be turned inward. 做上了沙发了 哈哈 本帖最后由 红色的血 于 2011-8-3 16:25 编辑
噢 那么西方又凭什么来批评中国？不过老外就是有一个本事就是没出事情是说明是好的，出了事情说明不掩饰还是好的。。。。。。。不过这逻辑只能在这用别处不准 中国有资格用默多克丑闻来抨击西方吗？
当然有，全世界人民都有这个资格！ 老外虚伪起来比中国人厉害太多了。 只许州官放火不许百姓点灯，强盗就是强盗 好酸、好酸 终于将屁股朝天了，没什么不一样都是长满黑疮的！ 2008年西藏发生暴乱时，西方媒体错误地使用了一张尼泊尔警察暴行的照片，这在中国网络上掀起了轩然大波。
-------------------------------------------------------
就这一句便再一次证明了西方媒体的无耻和不要脸，3.14的报道对西方媒体来说仅仅是错误使用图片吗？那是赤裸裸的造假，不要脸的造假，歇斯底里的造谣，把那些别有用心的截图、张冠李戴的图片拿到他们面前，请问西方媒体还有脸说错误的使用吗？ 哦 08年你们只用了一张“错误图片”？？那我们也只是发了一条新闻！而且我们这条新闻不是错误的！ 舆论霸权！ 有说话的权力就是好，对的可以说成错的，好的可以说成坏的，反之亦然！:D
上面这话怎么这么怪呢？{:soso_e143:} 虽然中国的新闻自由不咋地（庆幸动车事件看到了国内媒体为自由的抗争），但中国恰恰是全球最有资格抨击这一事件的国家，没有之一。
出了丑闻还嘴硬，就像粪坑里的石头。 当然可以！ 好笑，一直在撒谎，还说是偶尔弄错了张图，通过你们的宣传的中国，是真实的中国吗？相差太多了吧，每一个来过中国的人大多会这样认为。 我们中国只是说实话,
不像你们虚伪的西方只是为了掩盖你们的谎言偶尔说实话. lch110 发表于 2011-8-3 17:23 static/image/common/back.gif
中国有资格用默多克丑闻来抨击西方吗？
当然有，全世界人民都有这个资格！ ...
银河系的人都有资格批评这种烂东西!!!! {:soso_e194:} 什么是资格？什么又是批评的权利？