【2011.3.22 纽约时报】中国强烈要求结束对利比亚空袭
本帖最后由 下个月 于 2011-3-24 16:26 编辑【中文标题】中国强烈要求结束对利比亚空袭【原文标题】China Urges Quick End To Airstrikes In Libya【登载媒体】纽约时报【来源地址】http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/23/world/asia/23beiijing.html【原文库】http://bbs.m4.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=315308&page=1&extra=#pid4258543【译者】逆卷炎灵（三流翻译，请多指教）【翻译方式】人工【声明】本翻译供Anti-CNN使用，未经AC或译者许可，不得转载。【译文】
China Urges Quick End To Airstrikes In LibyaBy ANDREW JACOBSPublished: March 22, 2011
中国强烈要求结束对利比亚空袭文：ANDREW JACOBS2011年3月22日
BEIJING — China escalated its opposition to American-led airstrikes on Libya on Tuesday, joining Russia and India in calls for an immediate cease-fire and suggesting that coalition forces were imperiling civilians by exceeding the United Nations-mandated no-fly zone. 北京——周二，中国升级了对美国主导的对利比亚空袭的反对态度，与俄国、印度一起，呼吁迅速停火，暗示联军越过联合国设立的禁飞区并危机平民。
The rising criticism among the so-called BRIC group — Brazil, Russia, India and China — came amid allegations by the Libyan government that allied bombings had killed or wounded scores of civilians, a claim rejected by American military officials.
持续升温的反对声音来自“金砖四国”——巴西、俄国、印度和中国，这些反对来自利比亚政府对联军轰炸、伤害大量平民的指控，而美国美国军方官员对此表示否认。
On Monday, hours after the departure of President Obama, Brazil issued a statement condemning the attacks and urging “the start of dialogue.”
周一，在奥巴马总体离开后几小时后，巴西发表了一份声明谴责空袭，期望“和平对话的开始”。
China’s response to the campaign has been the most forceful, warning that the assault could bring about a “humanitarian disaster.” In a news briefing Tuesday, Jiang Yu, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, called for an end to hostilities. “We’ve seen reports that the use of armed force is causing civilian casualties, and we oppose the wanton use of armed force leading to more civilian casualties,” she said.
中国对这次行动的回应最为强烈，并警告这次空袭将会带来一场“人道主义灾难”。在周二的新闻发布会上，外交部发言人姜瑜呼吁结束冲突。“中方注意到有关国家对利采取军事行动造成平民伤亡的报道，我们反对滥用武力造成更多平民伤亡和更大的人道主义灾难。”她说道。
(译者注：以下是原话，并不仅是上面两句。中方注意到有关国家对利采取军事行动造成平民伤亡的报道，对此深表关切。安理会相关决议的初衷是保护利平民的安全。我们反对滥用武力造成更多平民伤亡和更大的人道主义灾难。据报道，利比亚已要求其武装部队停止了军事行动，我们再次呼吁有关各方立即停火，通过和平方式解决利问题。)
China was one of five countries to abstain from the United Nations resolution that authorized the allied airstrikes against the forces of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, which have been seeking to crush a rebellion against his four-decade rule. Russia, Brazil, India and Germany also abstained, while South Africa joined nine other Security Council members in supporting the resolution approved last week.
卡扎菲一直对反抗其40年统治的反对派进行镇压，联合国对此做出授权联军对卡扎菲势力进行空袭的决议。中国是五个投弃权票的国家之一，其中还有俄国、巴西及得过，然而南非则加入了其他9个安理会成员之中，支持这份决议。
In its decision to abstain rather than block the resolution through its veto power, China said it was heeding the wishes of the Arab League and the African Union.
中国决定弃权而非利用其否决权来反对这项决议，对此中国称这是出于对阿拉伯联盟及非洲联盟意愿的关注。
(译者注，原话如下：中国历来反对在国际关系中使用武力，对该决议中的一些内容是有严重保留的。但考虑到阿拉伯国家和非盟的关切和立场以及利比亚当前的特殊情况，中方和有关国家一道对决议投了弃权票。)
During a meeting with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Tuesday, Russia’s defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, added his voice to those calling for a cease-fire, saying it was the best way to avoid civilian casualties, according to The Associated Press. On Monday, Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin was unsparing in his criticism, comparing the allied campaign against Libya to the invasion of Iraq and likening it to a “medieval call for a crusade.” In a rare expression of dissent between the country’s two leaders, President Dmitri A. Medvedev later criticized the remarks as unacceptable.
据美联社称，周二，在与国防部长盖茨的一起的会议上，俄国国防部长谢尔久科夫，重申了他要求停战的态度，称这是防止人道主义灾难的最佳方式。周一，普京总理强烈谴责这次行动，他把这次针对利比亚的行动与入侵伊拉克相对比，称其为“中世纪的十字军东侵”。然而总统梅德韦杰夫却称这种说法不可接受，这是该国两位领导人之间发生的鲜有的分歧。
(译者注相关新闻链接“普京称打击利比亚似十字军东征 梅德韦杰夫批评”http://news.qq.com/a/20110322/000409.htm)
On Tuesday, Indian officials joined those calling for a cease-fire. Pranab Mukherjee, the country’s finance minister and a leader of the lower house of Parliament, told lawmakers that the coalition had no right to oust the ruler of a sovereign nation.
在周二，印度官方一起呼吁停火。印度财政部长、下议院领导人慕克吉告诉立法者们，联军没有权利驱逐一个主权国家的统治者。
(译者注相关新闻链接“印度反对多国空袭利比亚 称西方无权干涉利内政” http://news.cn.yahoo.com/ypen/20110322/271383.html)
The Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said Tuesday that Turkey supported providing humanitarian aid to Libya but that it would “never be the party that points weapons at the Libyan people.” Turkey, the only Muslim member of NATO, had opposed an alliance plan for the no-fly zone.
周二，土耳其总理埃尔多安称土耳其将会对利比亚提供人道主义援助，但 “不会向任何一方提供用于攻打利比亚人民的武器”。土耳其作为北约组织的唯一一个穆斯林国家，反对联军关于禁飞区的计划。
(译者注相关新闻链接“土耳其总理称联军行动已成“侵略” 曾劝卡扎菲交权” http://world.huanqiu.com/roll/2011-03/1582717.html)
The Chinese news media, meanwhile, have been vociferous in expressing opposition to the military campaign against the Libyan government, with articles and commentaries depicting the assault as an attempt to grab that country’s oil resources and expand American influence in the region.
其间，中国的新闻媒体大声地表达了对联军针对利比亚政府行动的反对，相关文章及评论将这次行动解释为对利比亚石油资源的掠夺及美国扩充在该地区影响力的需要。
A front-page article in People’s Daily on Tuesday said the United Nations resolution characterizing the Libyan army’s attack on civilians as a possible “crime against humanity” was simply cover for what it called the West’s hegemonic intentions.
周二，人民日报的首页称，在利比亚的军队袭击平民可能造成“反人道罪”，联合国的这份决议仅仅是对所谓的“西方霸权主义”的掩饰。（译者注：此处略含有不承认霸权主义这种说法的意思）
“Historical experience has shown that humanitarian intervention is only an excuse for military intervention into other countries’ domestic affairs,” wrote the author, Tang Zhichao, a scholar at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations. “They claim to be motivated by morality but in fact they are driven by narrow political and economic interests.”
唐志超，中国当代国际关系学院的一位学者，这样写道：“历史经验往往表明，所谓人道主义干涉往往是武力干涉他国内政的借口”。他说：“他们名义上是出于国际道义，但实际上则是出于狭隘的政治或经济利益。”
(译者注相关新闻链接“唐志超：空袭利比亚 他们打着“人道主义”的幌子” http://opinion.hexun.com/2011-03-22/128108308.html)
An editorial in Global Times, owned by People’s Daily, went further, saying that Western nations should be penalized for “abusing” the Security Council resolution that paved the way for the attack. “Just let them agonize there in Libya,” the paper said, referring to the United States and its partners. “No matter what happens to Qaddafi, a chaotic Libya will become an unshakable burden for the West forever.”
人民日报旗下环球时报的一份社论称“西方应为滥用安理会决议埋单”，该报认为“无论卡扎菲个人的命运如何，一个混乱的利比亚都将成为西方再也推卸不掉的负担。”
(译者注相关新闻链接“环球时报社评：西方应为滥用安理会决议埋单” http://news.sina.com.cn/pl/2011-03-23/075722164413.shtml)
Sebnem Arsu contributed reporting from Istanbul. Zhang Jing contributed research from Beijing.
伊斯坦布尔Sebnem Arsu，北京张晶报道。
=====================
译者评论：小白兔被人捧了，装可爱被指不乖……真是没话说，外交部这次没有强烈谴责，看来用不用强烈都一样，反正在外媒眼里就那样……外媒这番报道让网易和各位带路党媒体情何以堪……你们叫的这么欢，人家也不关注你……真是卖命不讨好。其间，中国的新闻媒体大声地表达了对联军针对利比亚政府行动的反对，相关文章及评论将这次行动解释为对利比亚石油资源的掠夺及美国扩充在该地区影响力的需要。 楼主辛苦了。 我们现在要求结束对利比亚的空袭，为什么在1973号文件投票时不投否决票呢？是不是有点事后诸葛呢？ 回复 3# waly
什么脑子 投否决票等于你跟老卡站一边了 回复 4# stuart123
既然如此那就没必要现在站出来谴责！你说呢？ 谴责是针对越权军事行动而不是1973决议
你这种非此即彼 非敌即友 有立场无原则的思维哎。。 回复 5# waly
什么脑子？中国同意设禁飞区是考虑到阿盟和非盟意见，连他们一伙的都支持，中国反对什么？美英法现在是轰炸，应经超越的决议的范围，中国当然要谴责。 据说美国要撤出来不知道是不是真的 反正就是一群狼在吃长个小犄角的小山羊。 揭了我们被八国联军入侵的伤疤！ 为什么又把中国揪出来了..躺着都挨枪子..日了 我们现在要求结束对利比亚的空袭，为什么在1973号文件投票时不投否决票呢？是不是有点事后诸葛呢？
投票无非三种选择：
一、投赞成票。如果卡扎菲不倒台，那就会象法国一样蠢。
二、投反对票。如果反对派获胜，那将失去在利比亚的所有利益。
三、投弃权票。任何头脑清醒的人的明智选择。左右逢源，进可攻，退可守。 回复 3# waly
你好好看看1973再说。中国赞同建立禁飞区，但在1973中有些条款没法接受，只有弃权。 楼主辛苦了，加油，翻得不错哦{:13_684:} 既然我们当时不能反对但现在这个时候需要有人站出来主持正义了中国就是这个角色 周一，普京总理强烈谴责这次行动，他把这次针对利比亚的行动与入侵伊拉克相对比，称其为“中世纪的十字军东侵”。然而总统梅德韦杰夫却称这种说法不可接受，这是该国两位领导人之间发生的鲜有的分歧。
====================
我倒是对这二位比较感兴趣，一个唱红脸一个唱白脸，也算左右逢源了吧{:12_549:} 中国外交部强烈谴责此卑劣行径！ 哎，什么时候才能行使武力呢 哎，什么时候才能行使武力呢 不知道西方媒体和读者 怎么评论 很肯能会被主流屏蔽
现在萨科奇有点骑虎难下的意思了， “看在自由世界的份上，拉兄弟一把吧”
页:
[1]
2