【华尔街日报111009】法院发出邮箱密令 搜索维基解密志愿者
本帖最后由 godstear4u 于 2011-10-11 13:50 编辑【中文标题】法院发出邮箱密令 搜索维基解密志愿者
【原文标题】Secret Orders Target EmailWikiLeaks Backer's Information Sought
【登载媒体】美国华尔街日报
【来源地址】http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203476804576613284007315072.html?mod=WSJAsia_hpp_LEFTTopStories#articleTabs%3Darticle
【译 者】godstear4u
【翻译方式】人工
【声 明】欢迎转载，请务必注明译者和出处 bbs.m4.cn。
The U.S. government has obtained a controversial type of secret court order to force Google Inc. and small Internet provider Sonic.net Inc. to turn over information from the email accounts of WikiLeaks volunteer Jacob Appelbaum, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
华尔街日报记者通过调查文件发现，美国政府通过法院获得一份极具争议的密令：强制要求谷歌和和小型互联网提供商索尼克网络公司移交维基解密志愿者Jacob Appelbaum个人邮箱账户。
Sonic said it fought the government's order and lost, and was forced to turn over information. Challenging the order was "rather expensive, but we felt it was the right thing to do," said Sonic's chief executive, Dane Jasper. The government's request included the email addresses of people Mr. Appelbaum corresponded with the past two years, but not the full emails.
索尼克说他曾试着反抗政府命令但是失败了，最后不得不移交信息。索尼克的首席执行官Dane Jasper说，“违令代价太过高昂，但我们觉得这是正义之举”政府要求提供Appelbaum过去两年内一直使用的邮箱地址，但并未要求他的所有邮箱账户
Both Google and Sonic pressed for the right to inform Mr. Appelbaum of the secret court orders, according to people familiar with the investigation. Google declined to comment. Mr. Appelbaum, 28 years old, hasn't been charged with wrongdoing.
据知情人讲，谷歌和索尼克都曾极力争取权利以将法院密令的消息通知Appelbaum先生。谷歌拒绝对这位28岁未曾受到任何指控的Appelbaum先生作出任何评论。The court clashes in the WikiLeaks case provide a rare public window into the growing debate over a federal law that lets the government secretly obtain information from people's email and cellphones without a search warrant. Several court decisions have questioned whether the law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, violates the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
公众关于允许政府不需要任何搜查证就可以秘密获得公民邮箱和手机信息的了联邦法律的争论不断高涨，而这起维基解密案件中的法庭冲突为这一争论的公开化打开了一扇宝贵的窗户。一些法庭判决已经引起了人们质疑电子传播隐私法案是否违背了美国宪法第四修正案中关于反对无理搜查和抓捕的保护条例的规定。
本文网友评论更加精彩，详见http://bbs.m4.cn/thread-3213608-1-1.html
围观米国右愤狂喷观海不民主不自由，相比之下中国JY弱爆了 搂主辛苦了，若能翻译些跟帖评论更好一些。 楼主辛苦啦 Several court decisions have questioned whether the law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, violates the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
页:
[1]