四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 23599|回复: 64

看看米国人民对完美的NBC版开幕式的评价(ZT)

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-8-11 04:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
.      呵~~正在下载NBC的开幕式视频,所以这么晚了还没睡呢。看了开头一截,的确录播得很有水平。原因当然还有一点:是时隔了12小时,不是直播而是录播,所以效果比CCTV的感觉好是很自然的!以下是在一个论坛发现的有网友翻译的美国网友对开幕式的留言,几乎都是震惊,想不通就有这么多国内的人对开幕式吹毛求疵,简直不可理喻

这是一个论坛上网友翻译过来的(美国网友原文在下一楼),括号部分是翻译网友自己的感受
1
会重播么?
2
希望NBC聪明点,以后出个3D+大屏幕的剧院版。这么难得的机会,每个人都应该好好欣赏。再也不会有这么“壮观”的表演了——什么巨碗、奥斯卡奖、拉斯维加斯的那些show,还有其他的奥运会开幕式,以后统统没戏。2112年就轮到伦敦,就在这届后面,我开始可怜他们了。
(这哥们有点激动,把2012打成2112了,差100年呢)
3
给NBC的主持一份发音指南吧。把别国的名字乱叫,听着痛苦死了。
(看来米国主持文盲的也不少)
4
我得说这开幕式是我看过的最NB的一个。放手让中国人干吧,他们弄的东西即彪悍又有创意。
5
中国的开幕式太宏大了,相比之下其他赛事的开幕式就像破烂卡车走行。可怜2012年的老伦敦!中国比大家预期的还棒。虽然政治上还有点问题,但中国人应该为此骄傲。这么有创意的开幕式,只有杰克森或者斯皮尔博格能接近这个水准。洛杉矶和芝加哥应该非常小心了。可怜的伦敦。
(米国人民似乎很享受看约翰牛牛的笑话)
6
……
(这哥们写了一大堆,从N多年前回忆至今,历数NBC解说员的不是。解说员在哪儿都是不招人待见的活儿)
7
我同意开幕式很不错,很多值得纪念的时刻,也有很多很漂亮的表演。但是没看到有关体育和奥林匹克的东西。一般开幕式都会提到之前的举办城市,大家也能学到点关于奥林匹克历史和奥林匹亚的内容。这次也有运动员或是有关运动的场面,但是直到运动员入场我都没看出来这是个“体育”活动。不过也许这也是个进步?整个演出铁定是很有创意的,演绎开幕式的全新思路。
(很多中国观众也有同感)
8
我恨死NBC了。他们应该直播开幕式——就像全世界其他地方一样。那么多人费了牛劲在网上到处找直播。
(米国同学不容易啊,看个电视这累的)
9
太欺负人了。
我们又去不了现场,还能上哪儿看?
延迟播出的开幕式获得高收视率……可笑又可悲……限制观众,NBC算是得逞了。开幕式应该直播!
10
卖DVD应该是中国的权力,肯定是全球畅销货。
(真的吗?CCTV又发了)
11
实在是受够那些人权啊、政治制度之类的狗屁评论了。
(群众的眼睛是雪亮的……)
12
其实,他们根本用不着斯皮尔伯格。太惊艳了,一辈子只能看到一回。
13
NBC是奥运会的大输家。这也是对中国的冒犯,人家费尽心血做这么好看的开幕式,我们观众有权看现场直播。可口可乐这样的大赞助商应该抵制NBC!
我们要得到尊重。
(米国愤青……)
14
可以去CCTV的网站看直播,但是要下载个播放器什么的……
(估计CCTV国外访问量最近暴涨)
15
开幕式太烦了,每个部分都拖拉的不行,就像跟中国人谈判一样。台湾的旗子再次表明:国际奥委会就是一帮拉皮条的。
(这哥们愤的厉害)
16
中国人的show很棒!NBC每播3分钟开幕式就插播5分钟广告,气死人了。
(CCTV也没这么令人发指啊)
17
……
(这个是质问NBC网站为啥非要用微软的Silverlight播放插件)
18
卖DVD的权力应该属于NBC,因为他们有独家转播权。虽然开幕式很酷,但谁会买回去再看一遍?
19
NBC掐了一些片段,像京剧和提线木偶就没了。希望有个DVD完整版的。
(怕的不是掐,是不知道掐了什么。米国同学期待还是很高的)
20
我倒不在乎延迟播出的事儿,但是至少播的时候要好好播。人家场景转换的时候他们就没完没了的插广告。这么漂亮、魔幻的表演,大家就想安安静静、完完整整看完,解说员又“Morning Show”似的不停在那得瑟。太滑稽了!他们甚至开了个专门的帖子,把网友的负面评论都弄那儿去了。我不是特喜欢回帖那种,但是这回NBC把这么特别的演出切的乱七八糟,真TMD把我惹毛了。有谁把美国的媒体好好修理一下啊!咱们国人又不是没文化爱唠叨的白痴,偏偏媒体就这么着对待咱们。
怒了……
(NBC跟CCTV是不是亲兄弟啊)
21
开幕式太牛啦,但我就希望NBC能限制一下他们的评论,然后广告再少点。放焰火的时候居然看不到,郁闷坏了。有些片段也掐掉了。通用电器也太贪了吧。
(跟GE啥关系?)
22
我买了个刻录机录下来了。看第二遍也觉得震撼。
23
很棒的show,最好的!我等着买DVD呢,谁有权卖DVD?
24
22楼的,你刻的DVD卖不?我要买。
(米国同学这会儿不说版权了?)
25
开幕式太彪悍啦,但是NBC的转播也说的过去。不是太差,也不是很好。为啥他们不在直播间放个中国人,可以解释一下文化背景啊啥的。还有他们老在说国家不是按字母、而是按比划多少排序的。我要看中国字!NBC可以在屏幕下面弄一小块,把英文名、地图啥的都标上嘛。中国字很酷,很好玩也很漂亮……特别是有几百万海外华人也在看转播。这个疏忽太没脑子了。
(知足吧同学,咱中国人民都没看见中国字呢)
26
4小时的电视
2小时开幕式
2小时广告
(无语)
27
表演很宏伟。张艺谋把电影转换成了活生生的奇观。
我看的时候很激动,不过当表演有一点点军事色彩的时候就有点不安。我忍不住想大概一个国家有统治全球野心的时候就会这样。
有点爱恨交加。
(这个同学是明白人)
28
买刻录机吧。
发牢骚的人都忘了,中国人收了NBC十几亿,NBC又收了广告商十几亿,而刻录机还不到150块。去看现场的机票+门票要2000块。
大家别犯傻了,像NBC一样老老实实掏钱吧。****可没说你有权免费点播电视节目。
(枪手,一定是NBC的枪手)
29
从没看过这么NB的:把5000年历史浓缩到2小时的表演,充满美感、魅力和宏大气势。我会再看第二、第三遍。
嫌开幕式烦的只能说明他不懂历史、文化、艺术,也不懂欣赏美。
(这个有点像装B的,你丫真看懂了?)
30
同意25楼。NBC应该把国家的中英文都标上,这样观众对排序就有概念了。
31
有人注意到没?希特勒的纳粹又回来了!看看纳粹德国的老片子,你就会发现中国昨天的表演是多么惊人的相似。
(又一个愤青)

32
开幕式庄严而且极具艺术成就——能现场看就好了。张艺谋干的漂亮。幸好斯皮尔伯格中途退出了——要不非得整成标准的幼稚夸张的美式大块头。
27楼说“当表演有一点点军事色彩的时候就有点不安”。你是指咱这儿每次体育比赛之前有军用飞机在头顶掠过的场景吗?

33
真想像不到伦敦奥组委的人现在有多抓狂。标准给抬的太高啦。他们肯定心里想还不如当初输给纽约呢。
中国的show已经比完美还完美了。现在就看他们能不能在奖牌榜上拿头名了。
34
为啥NBC解说员就不能让演出自然进行,非得在那儿唠叨个没完呢?Matt Lauer和Bob Costas就好像一对罗里巴唆的夫妻,在你看百老汇的时候坐在旁边不停大声说啊刚才台上演的是啥啥啥。
(不解说你们看的懂才怪)
35
我看过的最牛的现场表演。优雅、深奥,令人瞠目结舌。中国人动蒜!
36
只有NBC和那个喋喋不休的傻×Costas会在史上最大最震撼的焰火表演中间插播广告!赞啊!
37
弄个无广告的完整版DVD可真是好主意。
38
Matt Lauer和Bob Costas的解说压根就是电影《Dodgeball》的台词嘛。
39
不可思议,太精彩的演出了。
40
这个既然是事先录制好的,为啥要掐掉好些片段呢?每5分钟一个广告已经够烦了,再掐头去尾的乱剪就是侮辱大家了。
41
回32楼
我也快要被头顶上的飞机弄疯特了。
连接:http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=548554

[ 本帖最后由 梦回唐朝 于 2008-8-11 04:45 编辑 ]
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-11 04:36 | 显示全部楼层
以下是原文:
NBC Gets Record Rating for Tape-Delayed Opening Ceremony
By Richard Sandomir
The tape-delayed opening ceremony of the Beijing Games attracted an average of 34.2 million viewers Friday night, nine million more than the figure for the Athens Olympics on the comparable night in 2004.
At 34.2 million, it is the most on record for an Olympics televised in the United States from a foreign country. Before Athens, the average viewership for the 2000 Sydney Games was 27.3 million, for Barcelona in 1992 it was 21.6 million, and for Seoul in 1988 it was 22.7 million.
The Beijing figure fell 5.6 million viewers short of the 39.8 million who watched the live broadcast of the 1996 opening ceremony from Atlanta. And NBC’s opening-night viewership nosed out the 33.8 million who watched the 1994 Lillihammer Winter Games on CBS.
More recently, the opening ceremony of the 2002 Winter Games from Salt Lake City, which was carried live, averaged 45.6 million viewers.
Although Nielsen Media does not post Olympic ratings data earlier than 1972, NBC said that the 18.6 national rating from Beijing was the highest-rated Summer Games opening ceremony since CBS generated an 18.1 at the Rome Olympics in 1960, which were hosted by Jim McKay.
NBC’s performance Friday offered tangible evidence that it had not been hurt by those who watched live, unauthorized online streaming feeds of the opening ceremony on Web sites like the ARD German TV network’s.
NBC’s Web site, NBCOlympics.com, generated 70 million page views on Friday, nearly 10 times the traffic on the comparable day in Athens four years ago, and 4.2 million unique users, an increase of about six times.
Comments (129)             E-mail this Share
Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Newsvine Permalink Beijing Olympics 2008, Beijing, China, Olympics, opening ceremony, television Related
The Starting Line: Add One More to the Opening Ceremony Guest List
The BBC's Journey to the East
Thoughts From an American Descendant of the Dragon
NBC's Time Warp in Full Effect
129 comments so far...
1.August 9th,
2008
12:41 pm will the opening ceremonies be shown again? when?
— Posted by donald krebes
2.August 9th,
2008
12:41 pm I hope NBC is smart enough to produce a general release of the opening to movie theaters with 3D and large screens. This was an experience that everyone should have the opportunity to see properly. There has NEVER been a show this spectacular, no Super Bowl Halftime, Academy Awards, Vegas Extravaganza or other Olympics Opening- ever! I pity London as they try to follow this act in 2112.
— Posted by William Bergmann
3.August 9th,
2008
12:47 pm Be great if you could provide a pronuciation guide for NBC commentators. It’s painful to listen to Brian Williams pronounce Kyrgyzstan as Kergeeshstan, Ossetia as Oseesha, and Belorussian as Beloroooshan.
— Posted by krasnaya
4.August 9th,
2008
12:50 pm I have to say that this opening ceremony was the most impressive I have EVER seen. Leave it to the chinese to create awe and an massive inspiring event.
— Posted by Shawn
5.August 9th,
2008
12:56 pm China’s opening ceremony was so Spectacular that it makes all other Sports event openers look like Trailer Trash Monster Truck Rallies. Poor merry OLD England in 2012! China outdid all expectations and the people of China should be Proud despite political adversities to freedoms. Only Peter Jackson or Steven Spielberg could come close to their innovative Opener. LA and/or Chicago better be paying close attention. Poor London!
— Posted by (Just) Mike
6.August 9th,
2008
1:05 pm It’s always agonizing to watch NBC’s telecast of the Opening ceremony. One day we may be able to watch programs like this without commercials every 10 minutes. In America we have no idea of how much more beautiful and engrossing an uninterrupted ceremony is. In 1988 in Korea, I watched the opening ceremony on TV with two sets side by side. One was tuned to the NBC telecast through Armed Forces network, and the other was tuned to the Korean Broadcasting company telecast. The Korean broadcast was seamless and captured almost the entire pageant from beginning to end without any interruptions. It was possible to really get into the flow of the activities and get a full appreciation of the drama, action, beauty. The NBC telecast, on the other hand, was more about Bryant Gumbel being able to dialog with mic wearing Carl Lewis down on the field. “Wow” it’s wonderful said Carl or something to that effect. After being surfeited with mealy mouthed Bryant Gumbel and his inane, meant to be funny, quips, I shut off the volume and just watched the whole thing chopped up by NBC commercial TV. This year’s broadcast was pretty much the same, chopped liver with Bob Costas. After a while Bob Costas’s chatter got to be too much. But we get what we get.
— Posted by GEEP
7.August 9th,
2008
1:08 pm I agree that the ceremonies were impressive and awe-inspiring. So many memorable moments and beautiful feats. Lovely. But one thing I missed was a sense of the history of *sport* and of the Olympics. Usually Opening Ceremonies mention each of the former host cities and we learn something about Olympic history and Olympians. The spectacles include athletes or scenes from sports. Until the athletes entered the stadium, I didn’t see how this was a *sporting* event. But maybe that’s a positive thing? It was certainly very innovative, a new way of conceiving of the Opening Ceremony.
— Posted by Luke
8.August 9th,
2008
1:12 pm I REALLY hate NBC. They should have carried it live or online like the rest of the world. So many people had to go dig through other sites so they could catch it live.
— Posted by Kev Ricardo
9.August 9th,
2008
1:19 pm This is such an insult.
Short of being there,live,where else could I have watched ?
High ratings indeed for a tape delayed ceremony…this would be funny if it were not so sad… Creating a ‘captive’ audience, NBC achieved its goal. Thanks, but no thanks….The opening ceremony demands LIVE coverage.
livefromja
— Posted by jamaicajp
10.August 9th,
2008
1:23 pm The release right for DVD should belong to China. It will be on the best seller’s list worldwide.
— Posted by LR
11.August 9th,
2008
1:29 pm We are really fed up with all those talk about human rights or political systems and so so.
— Posted by Nash
12.August 9th,
2008
1:35 pm So…they didn’t need Steven Spielberg after all. It was truly amazing in a riveting, once-in-a-lifetime way. Cirque de Soleil multiplied 2008 times.
— Posted by Royi
13.August 9th,
2008
1:45 pm NBC is the bigger loser already in the olympics. It is an insult for China, they did these effort to show these beautiful ceremony, as audience we deserve to see it LIVE, The bigger sponsors like Coca Cola should not spend money with NBC anymore.
We demand Respect.
— Posted by Jorge Gaviria
14.August 9th,
2008
1:45 pm The opening ceremony can be viewed at the CCTV’s website (http://www.cctv.com/english/special/opening/02/index.s html). You need to click on the chinese link to download a player. I watched the truely spectacular ceremony last night on NBC and therefore I didn’t download the player myself. I suppose you can set a restore point on your PC to make sure the player can be uninstall later.
— Posted by TT
15.August 9th,
2008
1:46 pm The opening ceremonies were a big bore with each part dragging out like any negotiations involving the Chinese. The Taiwan flag issue proves once again that the IOC is made up of a bunch of pandering wimps.
— Posted by Frank A. Langheinrich
16.August 9th,
2008
1:50 pm Great show put on by the Chinese. Couldn’t NBC figure out how to air this historic event without 5 minutes of commercials after every 3 minutes of the ceremony? The constantly repeating ads we pitiful and annoying.
— Posted by GL
17.August 9th,
2008
1:52 pm While it’s great to watch the Olympic opening ceremony albeit tape-delayed. I find NBC draconian rights enforcement stifling and forcing Americans to use Silverlight on computers is an appalling measure while there are numerous players that should be allowed to access NBC videos.
Thanks to the NYT for its photos and uncluttered coverage of the Olympic games. I have loved watching the Olympics since my teens and will continue to follow all kinds of sports that are not usually marquee sports among Americans.
— Posted by AllsportsNYC
18.August 9th,
2008
1:54 pm The release right for the DVD should belong to NBC, since they own the exclusive broadcasting rights. As cool as it was though, who is really going to want to buy that and watch it more than once?
— Posted by Mark G
19.August 9th,
2008
1:56 pm NBC cut some of the segments (e.g. the beijing opera with opera muppets). I hope they release a full DVD version, so we can see the whole uninterrupted.
— Posted by LZ
20.August 9th,
2008
1:59 pm I don’t mind the tape delay, if they had shown the ceremony properly. They butchered the dramatic transitions by inserting excessive commercials, and squashed any hope for the viewer to experience the beauty and magic of the performance with non-stop “morning show” style drivel chatter. An absolute travesty. They even had to make a special thread for negative commentary on their boards: http://boards.nbc.com/nbc/index.php?showtopic=800173 because all the comments were negative. I am not one to write forum posts but I have to say that NBCs butchery of this unique event was so outrageous that I had to speak up. Please someone fix American media. We are not a nation of blithering uncultured idiots only our mass media treats us that way.
fuming…
— Posted by nbcshame
21.August 9th,
2008
2:08 pm Yes, the opening event was spectacular, but I wish that NBC had limited the commentary, and I especially wish there were not so many commercials. I was frustrated when the great fireworks displays were on and we couldn’t see them, and we did not see parts of the acts. General Electric got a bit too greedy.
— Posted by Gary Farland
22.August 9th,
2008
2:16 pm Glad I bought a DVR to record the show. It was stunning even I watch it the second time.
— Posted by Rick Bujak
23.August 9th,
2008
2:31 pm That was a great show, the best. I am waiting for DVD. Who gets the right for DVD?
— Posted by kyt
24.August 9th,
2008
2:36 pm Hi Rick Bujak,
You should sell those DVDs. I would buy a copy!
— Posted by mefeelsoolympics
25.August 9th,
2008
2:45 pm The ceremony was awesome, but the NBC coverage was just okay. Not terrible but nothing special. Why didn’t they have a Chinese person in the booth with them to lend greater cultural context to the play by play? Major oversight in my opinion. Another pet peeve-they kept referring to the fact that the countries were not in alphabetical order….and mentioned the characters/# of radicals determining the sequence. I wanted to see the characters! NBC could have easily included them at the bottom of the screen along with the english name, map graphic etc. Characters are cool, interesting and beautiful….and relevant considering the millions of overseas Chinese watching the broadcast. Seems like a no brainer to me.
— Posted by Patrick
26.August 9th,
2008
2:50 pm 4 hours of TV program
2 hours for the opening ceremony
2 hours for commercials…
— Posted by CS
27.August 9th,
2008
2:51 pm The show was spectacular. Zhang Zhimou was able to translate his cinematic brilliance to a live spectacle.
I found myself exited and a little unnerved at times as the spectacle displayed not so subtle militaristic elements. I couldn’t help but think this is what nations do when they have ambitions of global dominance.
I loved it and hated it at the same time.
— Posted by GG
28.August 9th,
2008
2:56 pm C’mon folks. While I recognize that there are some people far more interested in the spectacle of parade, costuming, fireworks and pageantry that is the opening ceremony, who could care less about track and boxing and gymnastic competition.To each his or her own but If commercial interuption is so important to you….
Buy a DVR.
The anti-U.S. business, whiney why-don’t-we-get-it-for-free-and-uninterrupted complaints here ignore the fact that the Chinese charge NBC billions and NBC is charging advertiser’s billions and a DVR costs less than $150. and tickets + airfare to see live costs $2000.00.
So whiners: Grow up, open up your wallet just like NBC did.There is no constitutional right to watch anything you want for free.
— Posted by Allan S.
29.August 9th,
2008
3:00 pm Have never seen anything like this: condensing 5000 years of history into a two-hour performance with beauty, charm, and grandeur. I would see it second and third time.
Anyone saying it is a bore just reflected his/her own ignorance about history, culture, art, and beauty–it has nothing to do with the awe-inspiring ceremony.
— Posted by Wendy
30.August 9th,
2008
3:15 pm I agree with you, Patrick, NBC should have shown the Chinese characters side-by-side with the nations’ English names, so that the audience have a better idea how the nations were ordered in that particular sequence. It’s actually pretty intuitive when you can see it.
— Posted by Lawrence
31.August 9th,
2008
3:20 pm Didn’t anyone notice: Hitler’s Nazi Germany all over again! Look at old clips of Nazi Germany’s displays and you will find a frightening echo of China’s display yesterday.
— Posted by Lou
32.August 9th,
2008
3:22 pm The opening ceremony was dignified and artistically majestic - I wish I were there to see it in person. Zhang Zhimou did an incredible job. Glad that Spielberg dropped out - he would have turned it into an American-style blockbuster, typically juvenile and bombastic.
# 27 writes, “I found myself exited and a little unnerved at times as the spectacle displayed not so subtle militaristic elements.” You mean like the military jet flyovers at American sporting events?
— Posted by Greg
33.August 9th,
2008
3:22 pm I can just picture the London Olympics organizing committee scratching their heads to figure out what show to put on 4 years from now. The bar is just too high now. They secretly must be wishing that New York got the Olympics.
China put on a show that was beyond spectacular. Now we got to wait and see whether they will top the medal charts.
— Posted by Pratti
34.August 9th,
2008
3:25 pm Why couldn’t the NBC announcers just let the event unfold without their banal commentary? The opening ceremonies don’t need a play-by-play; Matt Lauer and Bob Costas turned into that annoying couple that sits behind you at a Broadway show and reiterates loudly what just happened on stage.
— Posted by Phuz01
35.August 9th,
2008
3:27 pm The opening ceremony was one of the most spectacular live events I’ve ever seen. Elegant, sophisticated and quite stunning. Kudos to the Chinese.
— Posted by Kris
36.August 9th,
2008
3:30 pm Only NBC and that non-stop-babbling-idiot Costas would cut to comercials in the middle of one of the biggest and best fireworks displays in history! Bravo!
— Posted by RGM
37.August 9th,
2008
3:32 pm It’ll be a great idea to release a full coverage DVD version of this fantastic show without abridgement and Ad interruption.
— Posted by Sam
38.August 9th,
2008
3:32 pm Matt Lauer and Bob Costas commentary was straight out of the movie Dodgeball.
— Posted by Dodgeball
39.August 9th,
2008
3:32 pm Unbelievable, wonderful display and presentation! New York City forget about going for the Olympics until we commit to a public works standard set by China and Dubai. Without a mayor the quality of Bloomberg the odds are against us.
— Posted by difilip
40.August 9th,
2008
3:33 pm Since the entire opening ceremony was pre-recorded, WHY was it necessary to edit out bits of the opening ceremony? The commercials every 5 minutes were annoying enough… but trimming the entrances and exits during the ceremony to accommodate them added insult to injury.
— Posted by Jessica连接:http://olympics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/nbc-gets-record-rating-for-tape-delayed-opening-ceremony/

[ 本帖最后由 梦回唐朝 于 2008-8-11 04:46 编辑 ]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 04:55 | 显示全部楼层


太逗了,我现在也明白斯皮尔伯格为啥退出了
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 05:15 | 显示全部楼层
不说还好!搞得我心理痒痒的,还想再看一遍
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 05:28 | 显示全部楼层
借地表达一下自己的看法,因为我刚下载并看完NBC 录制的开幕式。5G ,清晰度比DVD 影碟还好,制作水平也高。比CCTV直播那个舒服太多。而且难得的是基调很正面,所以这里要特意表扬下NBC。

就开幕式本身而已,的确是做给老外看的。
比如很多地方,老谋子很取巧的用影像手段走马灯一样展示了中国古代的文明,老外有新鲜感,看了觉得很震撼、很神秘。自己人看了就觉得排场是够了,但少点深度。
还有那个点火方式,在我看来,只不过是吊钢丝,飞檐走壁而已,电影里多了去了,谈不上很好的创意;
实际上李宁走得也不是很自然,加上一些小失误,视觉上,真的不是非常舒服。但老外看了或许非常新鲜。

老谋子给自己打100分,也正常,谁让他辛苦了那么久呢? 但他说10年内没人超越,或许是说10 年内不太可能有人会投那么多钱搞这么大排场的东西吧。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 08:20 | 显示全部楼层
实在是受够那些人权啊、政治制度之类的狗屁评论了。
(群众的眼睛是雪亮的……)

同感,,求求他们了,让地球人清净一些.....
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
不要去批评对开幕式吹毛求疵的朋友.因为任何人已不可能否定开幕式的成功,不可能否定老张的成功!这是一件艺术作品,不可能没有一点差别
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 09:09 | 显示全部楼层
哪能下?BT还是emule?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 09:24 | 显示全部楼层
这个较为真实,希望AC多点这种的帖子
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 09:29 | 显示全部楼层
美国人说话很有意思~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:02 | 显示全部楼层
看他们的评论,我一个劲儿乐,他们太可爱啦!
有点疑惑:我看到的是只有一个多小时的表演啊,何来2小时之说?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:06 | 显示全部楼层
在哪儿下载的NBC版?给个链接吧
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:19 | 显示全部楼层
NBC要是出DVD就好了~~~  BOB的导播太菜了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:24 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 18xx 于 2008-8-11 05:28 发表
借地表达一下自己的看法,因为我刚下载并看完NBC 录制的开幕式。5G ,清晰度比DVD 影碟还好,制作水平也高。比CCTV直播那个舒服太多。而且难得的是基调很正面,所以这里要特意表扬下NBC。

就开幕式本身而已,的确是做给老外看 ...

毕竟中华文明不是老外们能那么容易理解的,所以浅显点是好事。
至于所谓100分,是张艺谋给整个创作团队和表演团队打的分。10年不可能超越之类的话,我不肯定是不是他真的这样说过。不过,有钱未必也能办出这么漂亮的演出,一个多哈亚运会的开幕式,比起咱北京奥运会开闭幕式和残奥开闭幕式花费的总和都多,也没给咱留下啥深刻的印象。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:33 | 显示全部楼层
挺有意思了,边看边乐~~~~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:34 | 显示全部楼层
美国人的评论太可爱了……
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 11:34 | 显示全部楼层
顶个!看来老美的朋友看不到直播也是挺痛苦滴啊。
居然还插播广告。NBC真会挣钱。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 13:27 | 显示全部楼层
2112年就轮到伦敦,就在这届后面,我开始可怜他们了。
(这哥们有点激动,把2012打成2112了,差100年呢)
===========
呵呵人家这才叫真正的“百年奥运”——办了100年
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 19:08 | 显示全部楼层
真有意思,看来惟政治论的只是政客和媒体而已啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2008-8-11 19:15 | 显示全部楼层
互相羨慕嘛!我們也想看NBC版的嘛~前提是~沒廣告的……
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-22 05:56 , Processed in 1.771394 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表