【10.10 NBCSM】1994年诺贝尔和平奖获得者“双手都沾满鲜血”

渔音谦谦

原文链接：http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mat ... e-blood-their-hands

CSMonitor: '94 Peace Prize Winners All 'Have Blood on Their Hands'
The Christian Science Monitor’s Dan Murphy and Tom Sullivan examined the politics behind the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday,and while looking back at past winners, the two equally blamed the 1994Prize winners- Yithak Rabin, Shimon Peres, and Yasser Arafat- for theultimate failure of their peace efforts: “All three men could be saidto have blood on their hands from that conflict.”Murphy and Sullivan began by acknowledging how “the surprisedecision to award President Barack Obama the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize hadmuch of the world scratching its head on Friday, even among thepresident’s most ardent fans.” After expounding on the President’s“loft promises...to diplomacy... and that a less belligerent America isin the offing,” the two reporters continued that “the peace prize hasoften been awarded more in hope than hindsight — and with an eye tonudging world events.”

The first examples of a “peace prize...awarded more in hope” citedby Murphy and Sullivan were the 1996 winners: “The 1996 award of thepeace prize to Cardinal Carlos Belo and politician Jose Ramos Horta —both prominent campaigners for East Timorese independence fromIndonesia — put a spotlight on their cause and helped create theconditions that led to Indonesia’s pullout from the country in 1999.”
The Monitor reporters juxtaposed this with the winners from two years before:
“The controversial awarding of the 1994 prize to Israeli PrimeMinister Yitzahk Rabin, Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, and PalestineLiberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat was less successful.Though the three men eventually signed the Oslo Accords that seemed tohave the two nations on a path toward peace, that effort eventuallybroke down. All three men could be said to have blood on their handsfrom that conflict, and Mr. Arafat died without achieving his dream ofan independent Palestinian state. Mr. Rabin was assassinated in 1995 byan Israeli furious that he was negotiating land concessions.”
What’s peculiar about this analysis on the part of Murphy andSullivan is their seeming to blame Rabin for the dissolution of thepeace process, even after acknowledging that he had been assassinated ayear after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. It is widelyacknowledged that the peace process broke down after the Camp DavidSummit hosted by then-President Clinton in 2000, five years afterRabin’s death. Peres, at that point, was not an active participant inthe Israeli government. The only recipient of the 1994 Prize that waspresent at that summit was Arafat, who is widely blamed for the failurefor the talks in 2000. So how can “all three men could be said to haveblood on their hands”?



—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.

nautilus

不知道这个94是指的94位 还是特指1994年的阿拉法特 佩雷斯 和拉宾
本人英语不好 但感觉有些不对

渔音谦谦

不知道这个94是指的94位 还是特指1994年的阿拉法特 佩雷斯 和拉宾
本人英语不好 但感觉有些不对
nautilus 发表于 2009-10-10 13:45

汗。。3Q。。是1994年的三位。的回顾篇。。。

谢谢。。谢谢==

渔音谦谦

这篇我领了。。

nautilus

汗。。3Q。。是1994年的三位。的回顾篇。。。

谢谢。。谢谢==
渔音谦谦 发表于 2009-10-10 13:47

不过 还是原来的标题吸引人哈 O(∩_∩)O~

fly111

呵呵，奥黑现在手上也有阿富汗人的血。。。怎么没人讲呢？

rlsrls08

呵呵，奥黑现在手上也有阿富汗人的血。。。怎么没人讲呢？
fly111 发表于 2009-10-10 13:51

就是。