四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1416|回复: 12

谷歌“透明度报告”-----美向谷歌索取用户数据次数高居各国之首

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-7-2 20:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
建议查看链接以获取更详尽资料。

谷歌公司6月27日在网上发布的最新“透明度报告”
根据谷歌公司6月27日在网上发布的最新“透明度报告”,美国政府2010年共向谷歌索取用户数据8888次,高居各国之首。其中,去年下半年美国要求谷歌提供用户数据4601次,该公司满足了其中的94%。

去年下半年,巴西和印度政府分别提出了1804次和1699次提供用户数据的要求,谷歌分别满足了其中的76%和79%。据报道,要求谷歌提供用户数据的理由大多是调查犯罪活动。巴西提出要求的次数较多,主要是由于谷歌开办的社交网站“我酷”在该国大获成功,让这个网站搜集了更多的个人信息。

报告还显示,世界上越来越多的国家或地区要求谷歌删除一些敏感或非法信息。去年全年,美国警方和法院共提出182次删除网上信息的要求,几乎涵盖了谷歌公司的所有服务领域,包括YouTube视频、Gmail邮箱、博客以及搜索结果等。

这些国家或地区要求谷歌删除信息的原因不同,有的出于政府的信息审查规定,比如法国和德国禁止发布煽动仇恨的演讲,泰国禁止批评国王的言论;有的出于法庭的判决。在德国,政府的一个青年保护机构要求谷歌删去搜索结果中有关纳粹大事记、极端暴力或色情的链接。在泰国,政府要求谷歌删去43条带有讽刺国王内容的信息。在美国,一名男子在一起诽谤案中胜诉,该国6家法院裁定谷歌删去论坛上1110条对这名男子及其家人进行诽谤的信息。

=====================
Transparency Report

Like other technology and communications companies, Google regularly receives requests from government agencies and federal courts around the world to remove content from our services and hand over user data. Our Government Requests tool discloses the number of requests we receive from each government in six-month periods with certain limitations.

Some content removals are requested due to allegations of defamation, while others are due to allegations that the content violates local laws prohibiting hate speech or pornography. Laws surrounding these issues vary by geographic region, and the requests reflect the legal context of a given jurisdiction. We hope this tool will be helpful in discussions about the appropriate scope and authority of government requests.

These observations on content removal requests highlight some trends that we've seen in the data during each reporting period, and are by no means exhaustive.



July to December 2010
Argentina
  • The number of content removal requests we received increased by 83% compared to the previous reporting period.
Australia
  • User data requests increased by ~72% compared to the previous reporting period because of a change in how Google categorized requests for data rather than an increase in the number of requests themselves.
Brazil
  • During the Fall election period in Brazil, the number of court orders issued from electoral courts rose, ordering removal of content related to political campaigns. In addition, one court ordered removal of more than 11,500 photos from Picasa. The lawsuit alleged that the photos contained images of pages from copyrighted books.
China
  • During the period that Google's joint venture operated google.cn, its search results were subject to censorship pursuant to requests from government agencies responsible for Internet regulation. Chinese officials consider censorship demands to be state secrets, so we cannot disclose any information about content removal requests for the two reporting periods from July 2009 to June 2010.

    As we announced in June 2010, users visiting the landing page on google.cn, now see a link to google.com.hk, (our Hong Kong site), where users can conduct web search or continue to use google.cn services like music and text translate, which we can provide locally without filtering.

    Hence, beginning with the July - December 2010 reporting period, we disclose the number of content removal requests we receive from the Chinese government. (For that reporting period, we received no requests.)

Croatia
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of content removal requests.
Denmark
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of content removal requests.
Hong Kong
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 80% compared to the previous reporting period.
Hungary
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of user data requests.
India
  • We received requests from different law enforcement agencies to remove a blog and YouTube videos that were critical of Chief Ministers and senior officials of different states. We did not comply with these requests.
  • The number of content removal requests we received increased by 123% compared to the previous reporting period.
Israel
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 80% compared to the previous reporting period.
Italy
  • We received a request from the Central Police in Italy for removal of a YouTube video that criticized Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and simulated his assassination with a gun at the end of the video. We removed the video for violating YouTube’sCommunity Guidelines.
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 29% compared to the previous reporting period.
Japan
  • The number of content removal requests we received increased by 271% compared to the previous reporting period.
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 29% compared to the previous reporting period.
Mexico
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of user data requests.
Panama
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of content removal requests.
Poland
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 216% compared to the previous reporting period.
Portugal
  • The number of user data requests we received increased by 26% compared to the previous reporting period.
South Korea
  • The majority of the more than 32,000 individual items that Korean government agencies sought to be removed were search results on google.co.kr that contained RRNs.
  • The number of content removal requests we received increased by 48% compared to the previous reporting period.
Thailand
  • We received a request from the Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology in Thailand to remove 43 pieces of content because they were mocking or criticizing the king in violation of Thai lèse-majesté laws. We restricted Thai users from accessing these videos.
United Kingdom
  • The UK’s Office of Fair Trading requested the removal of fraudulent ads that linked to scams. We complied with the request and removed 93,360 items in total.
United States
  • Six court orders resulted in the removal of 1,110 items from Google Groups relating to a case of continuous defamation against a man and his family.
Vietnam
  • We received a request from the Vietnamese government to remove search results on a particular word that generated results that contained allegedly unflattering depictions of past Vietnamese leaders. We declined the request.
  • For the first time, we received a significant number of content removal requests.

评分

1

查看全部评分

发表于 2011-7-2 21:10 | 显示全部楼层
谷歌= 米过最大的间谍网
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-2 22:18 | 显示全部楼层
回复 2# Jigong


    非死不可,推特,youtube,维基解密难道不是?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-2 22:44 | 显示全部楼层
它根本不是一个企业
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-3 02:14 | 显示全部楼层
即使索取也是自由索取和独裁国家强制索取是不一样的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-3 13:00 | 显示全部楼层
一路货色,
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-4 21:13 | 显示全部楼层
坚决干倒谷歌!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
发表于 2011-7-5 12:04 | 显示全部楼层
关于中国既英文甘多既!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-5 12:11 | 显示全部楼层
谷歌现在和明朝的东厂很相似啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-6 17:38 | 显示全部楼层
你很天真。按你的逻辑,自由的杀人跟独裁的杀人是不一样,是吗?一票选出来的政客政府做什么都是合法是吗 ...
mianyik 发表于 2011-7-5 09:56



    美国的索取是自由的,按照爱国者法案的,合情合理合法的~

点评

嗯嗯,只要你制定一个法案,一切就都OK。这就是美国的处理事情的方法,不合法?没问题,造部法律就可以让它合法。  详情 回复 发表于 2011-7-13 10:52
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-13 10:52 | 显示全部楼层
过路人 发表于 2011-7-6 17:38
美国的索取是自由的,按照爱国者法案的,合情合理合法的~

嗯嗯,只要你制定一个法案,一切就都OK。这就是美国的处理事情的方法,不合法?没问题,造部法律就可以让它合法。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-14 15:43 | 显示全部楼层
shuishenlan 发表于 2011-7-13 10:52
嗯嗯,只要你制定一个法案,一切就都OK。这就是美国的处理事情的方法,不合法?没问题,造部法律就可以让 ...

{:soso_e151:}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-7-15 13:58 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 voloin 于 2011-7-15 13:58 编辑

阿桑奇调查的是对世界有影响力的重大事件的情报,他追求的是真相,不是个人隐私。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-23 07:22 , Processed in 0.048037 second(s), 21 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表