四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 810|回复: 2

[已被认领] 【外交政策111111】Can we save America by ditching Taiwan?

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-11-14 10:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 lilyma06 于 2011-11-14 13:16 编辑

Decline Watch: Can we save America by ditching Taiwan?
原文链接:http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/11/11/decline_watch_can_we_save_america_by_ditching_taiwan


  
The New York Times has avery strange op-ed todayfrom Paul V. Kane, a former international security fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School. The piece makes the case that the U.S. should trade Taiwan to China for a deal on debt. Here's the argument:
       There are dozens of initiatives President Obama could undertake to         strengthen our economic security. Here is one: He should enter into         closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14         trillion of American debt currently held by China in exchange for a deal  to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and  terminate the current United States-Taiwan defense arrangement by 2015.         
    This would be a most precious prize to the cautious men in Beijing, one         they would give dearly to achieve. After all, our relationship with Taiwan, as revised in 1979, is a vestige of the cold war.                 
Kane argues that with this one bold stroke, Obama can "correct the country’s course, help assure his re-election, and preserve our children’s future." It could also "pressure Beijing to end its political and economic support for pariah states like Iran, North Korea and Syria and to exert a moderating influence over an unstable Pakistan."

Decline-o-meter: Giving this a two for the fact that we've gotten to the point where a suggestion like this is being featured on a prominent op-ed page. I'm all for counter-intuitive thinking, and intelligent people can disagree on the wisdom of the current U.S. Taiwan policy, but like most magic bullet solutions to major international crises, this makes absolutely no sense.
1. Why would China take this deal? According to the figures Kane himself cites, Beijing will spend around $500 billion over the next decade on Taiwan-related defense spending. So a $1.14 trillion debt write-off isn't really a bargain. Obviously Taiwan is a major priority for Beijing. But its trade relationship and relative economic position with the U.S. is a much, much bigger one.  
2. U.S. debt is approaching $15 trillion. Lowering that to $14 trillion isn't going to "save our economy". And I can't imagine a write-off on the scale doing wonders for the U.S. credit rating.
3. How exactly will this help Obama's reelection chances? I've always thought the argument that Obama is "selling out" U.S. allies was overblown, but it would be a bit hard to refute if he literally sold a U.S. ally.  
4. Even if this deal magically resolved the Taiwan situation, what does that have to do with Iran, North Korea, Syria, or Pakistan -- countries where China has completely different interests at stake?  If anything, it takes a bargaining chip off the table.  
Flawed as it is, the idea got me thinking. Canada holds about $90 billion in U.S. debt. Maybe they'd take a Dakota or two for it.  

发表于 2011-11-14 13:15 | 显示全部楼层
{:soso_e189:}领了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2011-11-14 13:16 | 显示全部楼层
baby60 发表于 2011-11-14 13:15
领了。

感谢认领
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-22 15:42 , Processed in 0.037570 second(s), 22 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表