|
|
本帖最后由 花落无声 于 2012-2-2 15:15 编辑
【中文标题】 韩寒对指控其代笔者提起诉讼
【原文标题】 Popular Chinese Writer Sues Over Accusations of Ghostwriting
【登载媒体】纽约时报
【来源地址】http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/01/popular-chinese-writer-sues-over-accusations-of-ghostwriting/
【译者】花落无声
【翻译方式】人工
【声明】欢迎转载，请务必注明译者和出处 bbs.m4.cn。
【原文库链接】http://bbs.m4.cn/forum.php?mod=v ... 1&page=1#pid5541121
【译文】
In what the state-run Xinhua news agency called a “fight between Titans of the written word,” a popular and outspoken Chinese writer filed suit in China on Tuesday against another author who accused him of having a ghostwriter.
一位很受欢迎并直言不讳的中国作家于周二在中国起诉另一位指称他有代笔者的作家，这被国营的新华社叫做“文字巨头间的战争”。
The libel suit against Fang Zhouzi, a prominent muckraking blogger, followed days of rumor and debate on Chinese microblogs about whether a ghostwriter had been behind the large body of work published by Han Han, 29, an author and race car driver. Mr. Han is seeking roughly $16,000, claiming damage to his reputation. His publisher told Xinhua that a judge would decide on Thursday whether to accept the case.
在关于29岁的作家及赛车手韩寒所出版过的大量作品是否出自代笔者的流言和辩论在中国微博上持续了几天之后，对以专门揭露丑闻而知名的博主方舟子的诽谤诉讼开始了。韩先生索要大约16000美元的名誉损失费，他的出版商告诉新华社，在周四将由一位法官决定是否接受这桩诉讼。
The first accusation of ghostwriting came from two weeks ago after another well-known Chinese blogger, Mai Tian, speculated — based on the dates and times of Mr. Han’s car races and those of some of his published posts — that he could not have been the author.
两星期前，另一位知名的中国博主麦田根据韩先生的车赛和一些博文发表的日期和事件推测他不可能是作者，在这之后第一个对韩寒有代笔者的指控出现了。
Mai Tian also asserted that Mr. Han’s father was involved in the ghostwriting, according to the blog EastSouthWestNorth, which has a timeline and translations of some of the back-and-forth between blogs and social media sites that led to the lawsuit.
根据博客“东南西北”——它有一条时间轴以及对导致了此次诉讼的博客和社会媒体网站间的一些往来的解读，麦田还断言韩先生的父亲和代笔有关。
On Jan, 15, the IT microblogger Mai Tian posted “Manmade Han Han: A Farce About ‘Citiizenry’ ” in which he alleges that the “miracle” of Chinese writer Han Han was created by his father, Han Renjun, and his marketing team. This blog post has been removed by Mai Tian since.
1月15日，一位IT业的微博博主麦田发表了《人造韩寒：一场关于‘公民’的闹剧》，文章中他声称中国作家韩寒的“奇迹”是由其父韩仁均和他的营销团队制造出来的。后来该博文被麦田删除了。
Mr. Han responded by offering a $3.2 million reward to anyone who could provide proof that his works were ghostwritten, and Mr. Mai relented, deleting the post and apologizing.
韩先生的反应是悬赏320万美元，奖励给任何能提供他的作品是被人代笔的证据的人，而麦先生动摇了，删除了博文并道歉。
Nevertheless, the story gathered momentum on the microblogs, known as weibo, which filled with nearly 15 million posts on the subject, according to Xinhua. Mr. Fang stoked the fiery debate by observing that many of Mr. Han’s posts had disappeared from the Internet.
然而，这个故事在微博上积蓄了动量，在微博上有接近1500万条关于这个话题的张贴，新华社说。方先生通过观察到韩先生的很多博文都从互联网上消失了而对这场炽热的辩论火上浇油。
“Posting a reward to look for evidence, while at the same time destroying the proof, makes people feel his claims of innocence lack sincerity,” Mr. Fang wrote on his microblog, Xinhua reported. Mr. Han said the posts were deleted for copyright reasons at the request of his publishing house.
据新华社报道，方先生在自己的微博中写道“一边悬赏寻找证据，一边毁灭证据，让人觉得他的无罪声明缺乏诚意。”。韩先生说删除博文是因为版权问题以及出版公司的要求。
Others leaped into the fray to defend Mr. Han, who continues to maintain his large following and bad-boy persona despite drawing fire from some dissidents last month for his seemingly lukewarm words about the prospect for democracy in China. An actress friend, Fan Bingging, said on her microblog that she would pay another $3.2 million in addition to Mr. Han’s reward to anyone who could prove that any of his work had been written by another person, according to EastSouthWestNorth.
其他人跳入争论来为韩先生辩护。尽管在上月因对民主在中国的前景发表的看起来不温不火的文字而招致一些反对者的抨击，韩先生继续保持着自己的大批追随者和坏男孩形象。根据“东南西北”，（韩寒的）一位演员朋友Fan Bingging（我怀疑是范冰冰。。中文哪有ging这个音啊- -。。。）在微博上说她愿意在韩先生的悬赏之外再加320万美元，给任何能证明韩寒的任何作品被人代写的人。
“If you read the microblogs posted by Fang Zhouzi concerning his accusation against me, you will find clear evidence of actual malice,” Mr. Han said in an interview on Monday quoted by Xinhua. Mr. Fang, for his part, told China Daily that he was not out to ruin Mr. Han’s reputation.
“如果你读读方舟子指控我的微博，你会发现明显的恶意。”新华社引用韩先生在周一的一次访问中说的话。而在这方面，方先生告诉中国日报他并没打算毁掉韩先生的名誉。
“Why should I bother to defame him?” he said. “I don’t even know him. There is no grudge between us.”
“我干嘛要费劲中伤他？”他说。“我甚至不认识他。我们之间没有私怨。”
The Chinese state media were quick to post English-language coverage of the debate, exhibiting some apparent glee at the feud. An opinion column in the state-run English-language China Daily argued on Wednesday that Han Han was probably innocent of the accusations against him for the simple reason that his writing was not very good.
中国国家媒体很快发表了这场辩论的英文版本，明显表现出对这场争斗的愉悦。国营的英文版中国日报的一个评论专栏在周三说，韩寒可能是无辜的，一个很简单的理由是他的作品不是非常好。
“A cost-benefit analysis doesn’t support hiding behind someone to produce works of youthful, though steadily improving, writing,” the author, Berlin Fang, writes. “Ghostwriting also takes talent and effort.”
“成本效益分析并不支持‘躲在幕后，产出稚嫩——尽管一直在提高——的作品’的可能。”作者方柏林写道。“代笔也需要才能和努力。”
Moreover, he argues, Han Han is not as prolific as some have claimed: “I am at least two or three times as prolific as Han while still maintaining a day job, writing columns for newspapers, raising two kids, doing household chores, translating novels and often serving as a volunteer.”
此外，他辩论道，韩寒并不像一些人宣称的那样高产：“我至少比韩寒高产两到三倍，而我还要维持日常工作、给报纸写专栏、养两个孩子、做家务、翻译小说，而且经常去做志愿者。”
|
评分
-
1
查看全部评分
-
|
狗仔卡
楼主
提升卡
变色卡
抢沙发
千斤顶
显身卡
发表于 2012-2-2 15:38
发表于 2012-2-2 15:56
