【已解决】句子翻译！谢谢了！！！

Rok-Viv

IN AMERICA this has been a week for the drawing up of lists—lists of the virtues of Barack Obama, lists of big names for his administration, lists of big tasks for his bulging in-tray. But in Congo this week a million hungry and terrified refugees are in desperate need of food and protection (see article). The two things are connected, in a way that may surprise, and dismay, Mr Obama’s admirers. If he is to prove worthy of the near-universal exaltation with which his election has been greeted, he has to prepare America and the world for the possibility of further American military interventions overseas.

请问蓝色字体的句子应该如何翻译
谢谢大家

kitty

如果他能够证明自己的当选值得全世界为他喝彩的话

dakelv

如果他要证明自己对得起全世界对他的当选所表现出的几乎一致的赞美的话，

Rok-Viv

原帖由 dakelv 于 2008-11-23 10:06 发表
如果他要证明自己对得起全世界对他的当选所表现出的几乎一致的赞美的话，

谢谢了啊

我就是不明白near-unversal exaltation 是什么意思
是否跟军事有关
因为这篇文章是讲美国和刚果的人道主义干涉的问题

这是网上找的（可能是对这篇文章的评价吧~）
Don’t Go Into Congo (Or Any Other Places)

Posted on November 13th, 2008 by Daniel Larison

Well, this took a week longer than I expected. The Economist starts the drumbeat for more intervention in Congo, and it gives Obama an ultimatum:

If he is to prove worthy of the near-universal exaltation with which his election has been greeted, he has to prepare America and the world for the possibility of further American military interventions overseas.

I’m hoping that Obama has no interest in being worthy of near-universal exaltation, and that he was not serious last year when he said that American security is inextricably tied to the security of all other nations. Perhaps instead he will be satisfied with merely nationwide forbearance? Maybe just hemispheric respect?

Let’s hope that Obama will stow away these suggestions that he act like the hyper-ambitious interventionist that he has claimed to be along with the promises he made in Berlin to help dissidents in Burma and Zimbabwe. When it comes to humanitarian interventions, there is usually a time-lag of one to three years between Economist leaders demanding action and U.S. involvement in a foreign crisis it has no business addressing. There would seem to be much more of a lag when it comes to interventions in Africa, because so few governments are willing or interested in doing much of anything about African crises. Better still, perhaps Obama could simply ignore calls to intervene and focus entirely on the American interest. That would be quite a change.