西方打西藏牌的目的无非是想转移国内矛盾！

Truth-home

西方打西藏牌的目的无非是想转移国内矛盾                            [翻译中`````  ]  原作者tinazhang  
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080413/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_olympicsWASHINGTON - It would be a "cop-out" for countries to skip the opening ceremonies at the Beijing Olympics as a way of protesting China's crackdown in Tibet, President Bush's national security adviser said Sunday.The kind of "quiet diplomacy" that the U.S. is practicing is a better way to send a message to China's leaders rather than "frontal confrontation," Stephen Hadley said.President Bush has given no indication he will skip the event. "I don't view the Olympics as a political event," Bush said this past week. "I view it as a sporting event." The White House has not yet said whether he will attend the opening ceremony on Aug. 8."We haven't worked out the details of his schedule at this point in time, but from his vantage point, if you listen to what he said, he has no reason not to go," Hadley said in broadcast interviews Sunday. "Because what he has said is we need to be using diplomacy."Calling a boycott "a bit of a red herring," Hadley added: "I think unfortunately a lot of countries say, 'Well, if we say that we are not going to the opening ceremonies, we've check the box on Tibet.' That's a cop-out."If other countries are concerned about Tibet, they ought to do what we are doing through quiet diplomacy, send the message clearly to the Chinese that this is an opportunity with the whole world watching, to show that they take into account and are determined to treat their citizens with dignity and respect. They would put pressure on the Chinese authorities quietly to meet with representatives of the Dalai Lama and use this as an opportunity to help resolve that situation," he said.Critics of China say that were Bush to avoid the opening ceremony, it would send a powerful signal of international anger over China's violent response to demonstrating Buddhist monks in Tibet."The whole issue of opening ceremonies is a nonissue," Hadley said. "I think it is a way of dodging what really needs to happen if you're concerned about" Tibet.British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will not attend the opening ceremonies. Brown's office says he will attend the closing ceremony. Merkel said the opening event never was on her schedule.Bush is going the Olympics to show support for the American team and all the participating athletes, Hadley said. At the same time, he is relying on "his own personal diplomacy" in dealings directly with Chinese officials.In a telephone call March 26, Bush pushed China's president, Hu Jintao, about the violence in Tibet, a necessity for restraint and a need for China to consult with representatives of the Dalai Lama, Tibet's spiritual leaders, the White House said."We have a lot of leverage on China. We are using it in a constructive, diplomatic way. And it is a lot greater leverage than just the issue of whether he goes to an opening ceremony or not," Hadley said. "The whole international community has leverage. They ought to be using it now, not letting themselves off the hook by simply saying, 'Well, we won't go to the opening ceremonies.'"China has defended its use of force against anti-Chinese protesters in Tibet, describing demonstrations as riots and violent crimes. The uprising is the most sustained against Chinese rule in almost two decades. It has put Beijing's human rights record in the spotlight, embarrassing a Communist leadership that had hoped for a smooth run-up to the Olympics.In their conversation, Bush "raised the issue of human rights, he raised the issue of what's going on in Tibet and he sent a very clear message that he believes it's in the interest of Chinese authorities for them to meet with representatives of the Dalai Lama," Hadley said.Asked whether confronting the Beijing government about Tibet in public was counterproductive, Hadley said: "It's an issue of the Chinese government. It's also an issue of the Chinese people, who are very invested in the Olympics, who see it as a coming of age for China. And so it's a balancing here. We think that it is very important to deal with the Tibet issue. But we think the best way to do that is through the kind of diplomacy we have been undertaking, not by the kind of frontal confrontation that's being suggested by some."Hadley spoke on "Fox News Sunday" and ABC's "This Week."  美国深陷伊拉克战争泥潭，经济陷入危机，打打中国西藏牌可以转移一下国内民众的不满情绪，美国真的关心中国的人权吗？猪听了都笑了！今天美联社又发了美国安全顾问建议布什不参加奥运的文章，继续不顾事实指责中国政府“镇压”西藏“和平示威”。简直无语了，人怎么可以无耻到这种地步！！！前面的新闻还在说美国在伊拉克又是宵禁又是扫荡杀人后面就不要脸地指责中国“镇压”，指责中国没有人权。人怎么可以这么无耻那！！！气过之后有点释然了，美国这样作的目的是借助西藏事件转移国内矛盾，如果能趁乱捞点好处就更好了，还口口声声自由民主人权，真是肮脏卑鄙虚伪下流的吓人！同胞们不要生气了，他们根本就不会给我们讲道理的，他们这样作都是成心的，是故意的，就是明目张胆地说谎，明目张胆地和齐伙来欺负我们，让我们为他的经济失误政策失误等等的失误买单。他们说的话全都是谎言，他们是有意这么作的！！！[ 本帖最后由 puer 于 2008-4-14 01:32 编辑 ]

medien

不同意，西藏是用来打压中国的，首先。

然后才是转移国内矛盾。

天马

这种打压中国的方式有效吗?我看是很落后的.是落后于这个时代的西方的一相情愿的闹剧.

tinazhang

谢谢楼主的整理，昨天看了Yahoo转发美联社的这篇新闻真的很生气。好像前一条新闻是美国扶持的伊拉克政府解散了巴士拉不听话不服从指挥的地方警察和部队1300多人，还有美国在伊拉克的单日死亡人数刚刚又创了新高（如果美国一天死了9人，那么伊拉克的抵抗组织和平民会死多少人啊？上帝啊，请赐予伊拉克人民真正的和平和自由吧！）。可是后面紧跟着就把自己粉饰成道德楷模拿西藏、人权说事指责中国政府。美国的人权糟糕到这种地步，有什么理由有什么脸面去指责别人？！更不要说是以莫须有的罪名指责别人了，这种行为不得不让人怀疑美国的真正意图是什么。
真的很气愤，我们中国人是那么的勤奋，我们的财富都是靠吃苦耐劳积累起来的，我们憎恶和鄙视强盗行为。我们的老祖宗教育我们做人要讲道德要诚实有信，我们含蓄内敛，我们识大体，可以为了大我放弃小我。我们不等不靠、不偷不强、不杀人放火，靠的是勤劳致富，我们笃信天道酬勤的道理！为什么他们不能正视我们这个勤奋的讲道德的民族的优点而一再地打压抹黑歪曲我们哪？！再看看我们一直以来是怎么对待他们的？因为这100多年我们一直落后，所以我们虚心地向他们学习，给他们享受的是比国民还高的待遇，但我们的友好没有换来他们的平等对待，反而是变本加利地打压和歧视。他们根本没有资格站在道德的制高点上来对我们指手画脚，我们比他们有道德几百倍！

vvstock

现在想想马克思，说的太对了。
垂死的帝国主义。 他们最强盛的时候，就是他们要灭亡的时候了！

马克思早就把帝国主义看透了！·
伟人阿，我们具然当初还对他们怀有好感，自己太幼稚了，被美帝国主义忽悠了！！！

自己的政府在有缺点也是为人民招想，美国人再标榜民主自由，也只是为他们服务。他们目的绝对不会为中国老百姓，是为了压榨！变相的压榨！有剥削本国人民，到剥削世界人民！！！！！！！

the911

就我看打压和转移矛盾都有，最主要的是这次德、法、美太幼稚了，如果这次西藏的事真想他们所说的那样，是镇压，西方这样打压有意思吗？管用吗？