|
西方打西藏牌的目的无非是想转移国内矛盾 [翻译中````` ] 原作者tinazhang
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080413/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_olympicsWASHINGTON - It would be a "cop-out" for countries to skip the opening ceremonies at the Beijing Olympics as a way of protesting China's crackdown in Tibet, President Bush's national security adviser said Sunday.The kind of "quiet diplomacy" that the U.S. is practicing is a better way to send a message to China's leaders rather than "frontal confrontation," Stephen Hadley said.President Bush has given no indication he will skip the event. "I don't view the Olympics as a political event," Bush said this past week. "I view it as a sporting event." The White House has not yet said whether he will attend the opening ceremony on Aug. 8."We haven't worked out the details of his schedule at this point in time, but from his vantage point, if you listen to what he said, he has no reason not to go," Hadley said in broadcast interviews Sunday. "Because what he has said is we need to be using diplomacy."Calling a boycott "a bit of a red herring," Hadley added: "I think unfortunately a lot of countries say, 'Well, if we say that we are not going to the opening ceremonies, we've check the box on Tibet.' That's a cop-out."If other countries are concerned about Tibet, they ought to do what we are doing through quiet diplomacy, send the message clearly to the Chinese that this is an opportunity with the whole world watching, to show that they take into account and are determined to treat their citizens with dignity and respect. They would put pressure on the Chinese authorities quietly to meet with representatives of the Dalai Lama and use this as an opportunity to help resolve that situation," he said.Critics of China say that were Bush to avoid the opening ceremony, it would send a powerful signal of international anger over China's violent response to demonstrating Buddhist monks in Tibet."The whole issue of opening ceremonies is a nonissue," Hadley said. "I think it is a way of dodging what really needs to happen if you're concerned about" Tibet.British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will not attend the opening ceremonies. Brown's office says he will attend the closing ceremony. Merkel said the opening event never was on her schedule.Bush is going the Olympics to show support for the American team and all the participating athletes, Hadley said. At the same time, he is relying on "his own personal diplomacy" in dealings directly with Chinese officials.In a telephone call March 26, Bush pushed China's president, Hu Jintao, about the violence in Tibet, a necessity for restraint and a need for China to consult with representatives of the Dalai Lama, Tibet's spiritual leaders, the White House said."We have a lot of leverage on China. We are using it in a constructive, diplomatic way. And it is a lot greater leverage than just the issue of whether he goes to an opening ceremony or not," Hadley said. "The whole international community has leverage. They ought to be using it now, not letting themselves off the hook by simply saying, 'Well, we won't go to the opening ceremonies.'"China has defended its use of force against anti-Chinese protesters in Tibet, describing demonstrations as riots and violent crimes. The uprising is the most sustained against Chinese rule in almost two decades. It has put Beijing's human rights record in the spotlight, embarrassing a Communist leadership that had hoped for a smooth run-up to the Olympics.In their conversation, Bush "raised the issue of human rights, he raised the issue of what's going on in Tibet and he sent a very clear message that he believes it's in the interest of Chinese authorities for them to meet with representatives of the Dalai Lama," Hadley said.Asked whether confronting the Beijing government about Tibet in public was counterproductive, Hadley said: "It's an issue of the Chinese government. It's also an issue of the Chinese people, who are very invested in the Olympics, who see it as a coming of age for China. And so it's a balancing here. We think that it is very important to deal with the Tibet issue. But we think the best way to do that is through the kind of diplomacy we have been undertaking, not by the kind of frontal confrontation that's being suggested by some."Hadley spoke on "Fox News Sunday" and ABC's "This Week." 美国深陷伊拉克战争泥潭,经济陷入危机,打打中国西藏牌可以转移一下国内民众的不满情绪,美国真的关心中国的人权吗?猪听了都笑了!今天美联社又发了美国安全顾问建议布什不参加奥运的文章,继续不顾事实指责中国政府“镇压”西藏“和平示威”。简直无语了,人怎么可以无耻到这种地步!!!前面的新闻还在说美国在伊拉克又是宵禁又是扫荡杀人后面就不要脸地指责中国“镇压”,指责中国没有人权。人怎么可以这么无耻那!!!气过之后有点释然了,美国这样作的目的是借助西藏事件转移国内矛盾,如果能趁乱捞点好处就更好了,还口口声声自由民主人权,真是肮脏卑鄙虚伪下流的吓人!同胞们不要生气了,他们根本就不会给我们讲道理的,他们这样作都是成心的,是故意的,就是明目张胆地说谎,明目张胆地和齐伙来欺负我们,让我们为他的经济失误政策失误等等的失误买单。他们说的话全都是谎言,他们是有意这么作的!!![ 本帖最后由 puer 于 2008-4-14 01:32 编辑 ] |
|