2008-2009全球国家和地区创新指数排名:中国列第37位

50年战争

印度工业总会与欧洲工商管理学院6日公布2008-09年全球创新指数显示,在全球130个国家和地区排行榜上,美国排名第一,德国第二,中国大陆排名37名,印度41名.

2008-09全球创新指数(Global InnovationIndex 2008-09)报告,由印度工业总会与欧洲工商管理学院在印度新德里公布.

“全球创新指数”旨在评估各国和地区针对创新挑战做出的反应,满分为七分,评估项目包括制度与政策、创新驱动、知识创造、企业创新、技术应用与智识产权等,提供企业领袖与政府决策者了解提升一国竞争力可能面临的缺失与改进方向.

报告指出,创新已不再局限于实验室或大学里的研究与发展工作,此外,创新能力与国家的收入水平也有密切关连,如经济合作暨发展组织会员国的排名,都超过非会员国.在贫困非洲地区,仅南非排名第43.

报告显示,在创新能力整体排名方面,前10名和得分依次为美国(5.28)、德国 (4.99)、瑞典(4.84)、英国(4.82)、新加坡(4.81)、韩国(4.73)、瑞士(4.73)、丹麦(4.69)、日本(4.65)与荷兰(4.64).日本从去年的第四名滑落到第九名.

中国的大陆地区排名37(3.59),台湾地区排名第16(4.41)、香港地区排名12(4.59).印度从去年的第23名下跌到第41名(3.44).

50年战争

http://www.thaindian.com/newspor ... d-41_100139529.html

US remains top Of Global Innovation Index rankings, India ranked 41

New Delhi, Jan.7 (ANI): The Second Global Innovation Index 2008 (GII) jointly published by Confederation of Indian Industry and INSEAD Business School, has once again placed United States at the top of the Global Innovation Rankings. India, on the other hand, is ranked a lowly 41.
The GII that has studied 130 countries has ranked Germany in the second position, followed by Sweden, the United Kingdom and Singapore.
The European economies including the Nordic ones continued to do well in 2008. Switzerland, Denmark and the Netherlands figured in the top 10 apart from Germany, Sweden and UK that figure in the top 5. However, France was the biggest loser slipping from the 5th to 19th position.
Singapore and South Korea are two Asian countries figuring in the top 10. However, Japan has slipped to the 9th position from the 4th and India its last year’’s ranking of 23rd to the 41st position. With China ranked at 37th, most BRIC countries have been ranked lower than last time. Israel and Qatar from West Asia and Middle East find places in the top 25. There are other countries from the Middle East just below this quartile.
The GII results have revealed that innovation is correlated with income levels in a country. For example, the innovation levels in the OECD countries are much more than non-OECD countries. There are few countries from Africa that are included in the rankings with only South Africa coming in at the 43rd position.
Over the years, through its own research, INSEAD has examined the many factors enabling national economies to achieve sustained and higher innovation capabilities. The goal has been to provide benchmarking tools for business leaders and policymakers to identify obstacles to improved innovation and competitiveness and stimulate discussion on strategies to overcome them.
This time and earlier in 2007, INSEAD based its innovation analysis on the Global Innovation Index (GII) and Framework, a highly comprehensive index for measuring global innovation, which captures the microeconomic and macroeconomic parameters and variables.
CII has over the years, taken a pioneering role in building a culture of innovation in Indian industry and society. It is CII’’s belief that the only way for Indian industry to have sustainable and inclusive growth is to adopt innovation as a business strategy. With this belief, a number of initiatives have been taken by CII in the area of innovation. To make a successful plan and roadmap for action, there is a need for India to align the measurement gauge with similar benchmark practices adopted globally.
Innovation is no longer restricted to the vertical structures of R and D laboratories and universities. Therefore an approach that goes beyond the number of patents registered, number of articles published in research journals and percentage of GDP spending on R and D measuring innovation is needed. This is the key assumption behind the approach used in this study.
The GII while arriving at the results has made a distinction between inputs and outputs while measuring innovation in an economy. Inputs are aspects that enable an economy to stimulate innovative and outputs are the results of innovative activities within the economy. The input pillars include Institutions and Policies, Human Capacity, General and ICT Infrastructure, Market Sophistication and Business Sophistication.
The output pillars that provide evidence of the results of innovation within the economy are Knowledge Creation, Competitiveness and Wealth Creation.
The data for the GII was collected from reputed international organizations such as the World Economic Forum, the World Bank and the International Telecommunications Union. In particular, a combination of qualitative and quantitative data is used for the computation of the GII. The qualitative data is obtained from the Executive Opinion Survey, a global CEO survey conducted by the World Economic Forum. (ANI)

lezaiyisheng

硬指标得出的结论的话，还是可以信些的。

中国应该在一些研究与统计领域做出些努力的！这有利于总结经验。