The Olympic Torch Relay Campaign （真相）

SANDK

http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56145

不知道是谁写的，讲的头头是道啊。那位帮翻译一下？

LHASA/BERLIN(Own report) - Conference reports and the research of a Canadian journalist reveal that a German Foreign Ministry front organization is playing a decisive role in the preparations of the anti-Chinese Tibet campaign. According to this information, the campaign is being orchestrated from a Washington based headquarters. It had been assigned the task of organizing worldwide "protests" at a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (affiliated with the German Free Democratic Party - FDP) in May 2007. The plans were developed with the collaboration of the US State Department and the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile and call for high profile actions along the route of the Olympic Torch Relay and are supposed to reach a climax in August during the games in Beijing. The campaign began already last summer and is now profiting from the current uprising in the west of the People's Republic of China that is receiving prominent coverage in the German media. The uprising was initiated with murderous pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population, including the Muslim Chinese minority. Numerous deaths of non-Tibetans provoked a reaction of the Chinese security forces.
According to the research by a Canadian journalist, a conference organized by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation (FNSt) gave the impetus to the current anti-Chinese Tibet campaign that violently forced the interruption of the Olympian Torch Relay in Paris last Monday.[1] The conference was the fifth "International Tibet Support Groups Conference," that was held from May 11 - 14, 2007 in Brussels. According to FNSt information this conference was supposed to do nothing other than the four preceding conferences [2] - "coordinate the work of the international Tibet groups and consolidate the links between them with the central Tibetan Government in Exile."[3] The German foundation, which is largely state financed, began the conference preparations in March 2005, and coordinated its plans with the Dalai Lama at his headquarters in the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamsala, India. More than 300 participants from 56 countries, 36 Tibetan associations and 145 Tibet support groups were represented at the conference.
Roadmap
After several days of consultations the conference ended with a concerted "plan of action". The paper is entitled "Roadmap for the Tibet Movement for the Coming Years" covering four areas of interest: "political support for negotiations", "human rights", "environment and development" and "the 2008 Olympic games in Beijing." The results of the conference are directed to the Tibetan people as well as "their supporters around the world."[4] Rolf Berndt, a member of the FNSt's executive council in Brussels, declared that the Olympic Games "are an excellent opportunity" to publicly promote the cause of the "Tibet Movement".[5] The conference participants agreed to make the Olympics the single focus of attack for their activities for the next 15 months.[6] They hired a full-time organizer for their campaign, who has since been directing the worldwide Tibet actions from their Washington headquarters.
State Department
The decisions taken at the conference in Brussels, prepared by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, are particularly significant not only because of the large number of participants but also because of the influential politicians who helped in their formulation. For example the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile, which enjoys much prestige among separatists, was represented by its "Prime Minister" Samdong Rinpoche. Also attending was another eminent politician from the Indian Himachal Pradesh state, bordering on the People's Republic of China, where the town Dharamsala is located, the "seat" of the Tibetan "Government in Exile." A brisk interchange takes place between Himachan Pradesh and the Chinese autonomous region of Tibet. Paula Dobriansky, the Undersecretary of State in the US State Department and special coordinator for Tibet questions also participated. She was a member of the National Security Council already in the Reagan Administration, continued her career in the State Department during the administration of President Bush Sr. and since 2001 was again in the US foreign ministry. Ms Drobriansky is considered to be one of the members of the neo-conservative inner circle in the Bush Administration and ranks as a hard-liner capable of imposing policy.
Every Day
As a Canadian journalist learned through his research, the campaign headquarters in Washington, that had been decided upon at the conference in Brussels, has been able to develop rather successful activities. Already at the beginning of August 2007, exactly one year before the opening of the Olympics, a close associate organized a high profile action at the tourist filled Great Wall to the north of Beijing. She maintains close contact to the Tibetan "Government in Exile".[7] Another close associate recently orchestrated the disturbance of the Olympic Torch Relay in Greece, seen on television around the world. The Washington headquarters is orchestrating other "protests" intended to disturb the Torch Relay. The campaign will reach its climax during the Olympic games in August. "We are determined to have non-violent direct action in the heart of Beijing, inside the Games, every day," one activist declared.[8]
Merciless
The anti-Chinese Tibet campaign, initiated under the direction of a German Foreign Ministry front organization (Friedrich Naumann Foundation) and a high-ranking representative of the US State Department, is developing its full efficacy in the aftermath of the uprisings in West People's Republic of China that began only a few days before the start of the Torch Relay. Whereas the German media mainly reported on brutal attacks of the Chinese security forces, eye-witness accounts provide a different picture of what happened. The British journalist, James Miles ("The Economist"), who was in Lhasa from March 12 - 19, reports of pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetan members of the population of the city, among them the Muslim minority. According to Miles, the shops of Tibetan merchants were marked and left unscathed while all other shops were plundered, destroyed or set afire.[9] In one building alone five textile saleswomen were burned to death. Besides Miles, western tourists also described the attacks on non-Tibetans. One Canadian saw how a group of Tibetans beat a Chinese motorcyclist and proceeded to "mercilessly" stone him. "Eventually they got him on the ground, they were hitting him on the head with stones until he lost consciousness. I believe that young man was killed,'' reported the tourist.[10]
Manipulations
Whereas Miles was describing the reluctant reactions of the Chinese security forces in an interview broadcast over CNN, the German media is using the uprisings as a backdrop to represent brutal Chinese repression. Facts obviously play a subordinate role. In the meantime, television channels and daily journals have had to admit manipulations of pictures. Film sequences with Nepalese policemen beating demonstrators were sold as documentation of alleged Chinese police attacks.[11] The security forces' saving a boy from an attacking Tibetan mob was coarsely labeled a violent arrest. Even Miles' report was editorially presented in a context to focus on Chinese repression. For the purpose of comparison, german-foreign-policy.com documents excerpts of a CNN interview with the British journalist as well as the corresponding passage from a renowned German daily.[12] (Click here.)
Anticipation
The pogrom-like mob-violence not only created the necessary media profile for the current Tibet campaign, initiated with the help of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, it also permits an insight into the character of Tibetan separatism. The "prime minister" of the Tibetan "Exile Government," who had participated in the formulation of the plan of action at the May 2007 Tibet Conference in Brussels, had already at the end of the 1990s, expounded in the German media on his views of the future of non-Tibetans, who had immigrated to Tibet over the past 50 years. In the case of a successful secession, they will have to "return to China, or if they would like to remain, be treated as foreigners." He explained the planned measures: "they will, in any case, not be allowed to participate in the political life."[13] The prospect of discrimination against all non-Tibetan members of the population was anticipated in mid-March by mobs in their bloody attacks on Chinese and members of the Muslim minority.
Please read also Strategies of Attrition (I), Strategies of Attrition (II), Strategies of Attrition (III), Strategies of Attrition (IV) and The Olympic Lever.
[1] Doug Saunders: How three Canadians upstaged Beijing; Globe and Mail 29.03.2008. Die Konferenz wurde von der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung in Zusammenarbeit mit der selbsternannten tibetischen Exilregierung und einem interfraktionellen Zusammenschluss des belgischen Parlaments durchgeführt.
[2] Die ersten vier "International Tibet Support Groups Conferences" fanden 1990 (Dharamsala), 1996 (Bonn), 2000 (Berlin) und 2003 (Prag) statt. Bereits die zweite Konferenz wurde von der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung organisiert.
[3] Gerhardt kritisiert Belgien nach Absage des Dalai-Lama-Besuchs; www.fnst-freiheit.org 11.05.2007
[4] Brussels Tibet conference roadmap for peace in Tibet; www.tibet.com 14.05.2007
[5] Valedictory Speech, International Tibet Support Groups Conference 5th, Dr. h.c. Rolf Berndt, Executive Director, Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung fuer die Freiheit,Brussels, 14th May 2007
[6], [7}, [8] Doug Saunders: How three Canadians upstaged Beijing; Globe and Mail 29.03.2008
[9] Transcript: James Miles interview on Tibet; CNN 20.03.2008
[10] Chinese beaten mercilessly - tourists; Herald Sun 19.03.2008
[11] Fotos aus Tibet; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 24.03.2008
[12] see also Augenzeuge
[13] "99 Prozent der Tibeter vertrauen in Seine Heiligkeit"; Berliner Zeitung 20.10.1997. Ähnlich hat sich erst kürzlich der Dalai Lama geäußert. "Alle Chinesen, die Tibetisch sprechen und die tibetische Kultur respektieren, können bleiben", sagte er einer deutschen Zeitung - mit einer Einschränkung: "sofern es nicht zu viele sind". "China mischt sich auch in Deutschlands Angelegenheiten ein"; Süddeutsche Zeitung 21.09.2007

cherry1982

试翻译如下：
奥运火炬传递活动
原文地址：http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56145
拉萨/柏林

会议记录和加拿大某记者的调查表明，一个德国外交阵线组织在西藏反华中扮演了关键角色。根据他的消息，这次活动是由一个华盛顿总部
操控的。

在2007年5月一次会议上，该组织确定以组织全球抗议为目标。这次会议由Friedrich Naumann Foundation（该组织与德国自由民主党关系
密切）发起召开。在美国国务院和自命的西藏流亡政府的支持下，该计划号召抵制火炬传递，意图使抵制在8月份北京达到高潮。这一活动
始于去年夏天，并从目前中国西部发生的动乱中获益匪浅，德国媒体对动乱进行了大量报道。这场暴动始于西藏一伙人对非藏人进行的蓄意
屠杀，包括汉族穆斯林。众多非藏族的死亡导致了中国安全部队的回击。

根据这个加拿大记者的调查，由FNSt召开的会议推动了上周一巴黎的暴力反华反火炬。这个会议是“第五个国际西藏支持组织会议”，于2007年
5月11日到14日在布鲁塞尔举行。按照FNSt的说法，这第五个会议的目的与前四个如出一辙。“协调国际上援藏组织，加强同西藏流亡政府的联系。”
这个德国组织拥有雄厚的财力支持，在2005年3月就开始为会议做准备，并与dl喇嘛在其所谓的流亡政府印度总部协调计划。大概有300个来
自56个国家，145个援藏组织的人参加了会议，经过几天讨论后，会议制定了一个协同行动计划。计划书题为“明年西藏运动准则”，包括
四个方面：支持政治谈判、人权、环境与发展、2008北京奥运。会议结论涉及西藏人，好像他们的支持者遍布全球。

Rolf Berndt, FNSt执行委员会委员，声称奥运是一个极好的机会，可以公开宣传西藏运动的起因。与会者赞同在随后15个月里将奥运会作
为攻击目标，他们为此雇佣了全天候的组织者，根据华盛顿总部要求，指挥各地的西藏运动。

由布鲁塞尔会议做出，由FNSt做准备的这一决议，意义非凡。这不仅因为参与者数量众多，还因为有影响的政治家也在其中掺和。比如
说，在分裂主义者中享有极高声望的那个自命的西藏流亡政府，，就是以其首席大臣Samdong Rinpoche为代表。来自印度喜马偕尔邦的一个
著名政治家也是参与者之一。喜马偕尔邦紧邻中国，当地的达兰萨拉就是西藏流亡政府的“王廷”。喜马偕尔邦与中国西藏自治区之间有着繁
荣的贸易往来。

Paula Dobriansky，美国副国务卿，也参加了该会议。早在里根总统时代，她就是国家安全委员会委员了，2001年以来，又进入美国外交部。
在布什政府中，Drobriansky 被认为是一个新保守派核心成员，一个能干的强硬主义者。在这个加拿大记者进行调查的每一天里，华盛顿总部
都能发动相当成功的行动。2007年8月伊始，距离北京奥运刚好一年，一名成员在长城边组织了一场鲜明行动。她同dl流亡政府关系极为密切。
[ 本帖最后由 cherry1982 于 2008-4-15 17:53 编辑 ]

cherry1982

第二段译文：
另外一个组织精心安排了对希腊境内火炬传递的扰乱，我们可以通过电视看到。华盛顿总部在策划其他干扰火炬的“抗议”。8月，抗议活动将达到顶点。有个活动者说。“我们决定在比赛期间每天都发起非暴力行动。”这场残酷无情的西藏反华运动，由FNSt和美国国会众议院议员指示发起，就在奥运前几天进行，产生了巨大影响。

德国媒体主要报道了中国警察的残暴镇压，然而目睹者的证词却说明事实截然不同。英国记者James Miles（供职于《经济学家》），3月12日至19日待在拉萨。他报道了西藏那伙人对非藏族居民以及穆斯林的屠杀袭击。根据Miles的报道，藏人的商店都做了标记没受损失，而其他商店却遭受洗劫、捣毁和焚烧。

一个服装店的五名女销售员被烧死。除了Miles，西方游客也描述了针对非藏族居民的攻击。一个加拿大人看见一伙藏人打一个骑摩托的人，残忍的朝他扔石头。“事实上，他们把他扯下来，用石头打他的头直至昏迷。我想那个年轻人是被杀害了。”在cnn的访谈中，Miles 用“勉强”来形容中国安全力量的反应，但德国媒体却把“起义”作为北京来表现中国如何残暴镇压。很明显，事实成了次要角色。与此同时，电视台和日报却不得不承认他们修改了照片。

尼泊尔警察驱走示威者的镜头被当成中国警察实施镇压的证据。警察从暴徒手中解救一个男孩，却被粗俗的说成是在暴力逮捕。甚至Miles的报道也被用作文章背景，以聚焦中国的镇压。出于比较的目的，german-foreign-policy.com （德国外交政策网）的公文摘录了cnn对英国记者的访问，对应德国某著名报纸上一段文章。对于屠杀式暴动的预期不仅使媒体笼统描述由FNSt支持的西藏运动，还许可了人们对西藏分裂者的理解。（这一句翻译不太明白。）

西藏流亡政府“首席大臣”，作为07年行动计划制定者之一，早在1990年代，就在德国媒体上详述了他对非藏族的未来的看法，那些非藏族人是在过去50年移民进藏的。如果分离成功，非藏族们“就不得不返回中国。如果他们留下不走，就将被视为外国人。”他解释说：“不管怎样，那些人将被禁止参政。”极有可能是这种对非藏族居民的歧视，造成了三月中旬暴徒发动的针对汉族和穆斯林的流血袭击。
[ 本帖最后由 cherry1982 于 2008-4-15 18:00 编辑 ]

SANDK

没有人顶，自己顶！！！

SANDK

谢谢CHRRY1982提供翻译