四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

楼主: 艾克

《给中国警员的批评和赞许》英国每日电讯报记者博客

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-7-11 08:59 | 显示全部楼层
兄弟能不能将下面人的跟帖
翻译下啊
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:11 | 显示全部楼层
看了下回帖,也许有些是国人回复的。
也有一个回帖姑且说是同情暴徒的,不过就那么一套,汉人移民占了他们利益之类的套话。
还看了下面有个反驳的同学,支持!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:17 | 显示全部楼层
了解,很好
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:18 | 显示全部楼层
让真相能够流传的更广,希望大家能够顶起。。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:23 | 显示全部楼层
比较中肯,我接受这个说法。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:26 | 显示全部楼层
相对客观。

可叹西媒中尊重事实的新闻人太稀少了。一般在办公室内产生新闻。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:32 | 显示全部楼层
以后只有多让外国记者来中国才能让国际社会更接近真相~~虽然也会有带着有色眼镜的记者,但是能有一个,两个。。。这样的忠于客观事实的西方记者,我们的声音就能传到世界上去,反正不开放外国记者来采访,他们也会诋毁、颠倒,来了还有机会还事实以真相~~~~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:36 | 显示全部楼层
英国电讯报继任的驻中国记者Malcolm Moore 的博客文章,
他承认在前一篇新闻里头给予热比娅过高的评价, 点出死者多数是汉人,承认一开始就判断受害者是维族是错误的。并且称赞中国防暴警察。

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/new ... al-dark-days-ahead/


Urumqi riots signal dark days ahead

By Malcolm Moore World Last updated: July 8th, 2009

Yesterday, I was able to use Twitter to relay real-time information from Peter Foster in Urumqi about the race riots which have claimed 156 lives.
Today, nothing works. Peter is not able to receive calls or text messages. My Twitter account has been blocked, even while using the virtual private networks (VPN) that help me skip past the Chinese censors. Twitter remains blocked in general in China, but others seem to be able to access it with their VPN. I guess the problem is just with me.
The situation remains tense in Urumqi, and Hu Jintao has had to fly home to deal with the issue. No one else has enough authority to impose himself above Wang Lequan, the powerful party secretary of the region and member of the politburo. Wang’s days appear numbered, however - the events in Urumqi may well compromise his reelection to the standing committee. It will be interesting to see if Hu flies directly to Urumqi.
Turning over the riots in my mind, I concede I was wrong in my last post to suggest that Rebiya Kadeer would rise in stature as a result of the riots.
When I wrote the post, I had limited information and I jumped to the conclusion that the 156 victims of Sunday’s violence were Uighur.
In fact, it appears that the majority of the victims were Han Chinese, brutally killed by gangs of Uighurs roaming through the back streets of Urumqi. There are some horrific pictures circulating of rows of bloodied bodies and cyclists lying in puddles of blood with their heads bashed in.
I apologise for running ahead of the facts, but the idea that Chinese troops had been unable to prevent the Uighurs from murdering Han Chinese honestly never occurred to me.
Now that the sequence of events is clearer, I have a lot of praise for the Chinese security operation in the city. According to Peter Foster, who is on the scene, they managed to prevent escalating situations getting out of hand several times yesterday with calm and judicious policing.
In addition, allowing journalists to circulate and protecting them from the crowd has clearly paid dividends. Rebiya Kadeer’s claims that 400 Uighurs were killed on Sunday were dismissed by my colleagues on the ground, who have neither seen nor heard any evidence to back up her accusation.
I would encourage the authorities to stop censoring the internet now. Allowing information to circulate does not lead to greater instability - this unrest has shown that the wild rumours that develop when news is suppressed can be incredibly explosive.
My feeling is that the Han Chinese, now that they have marched and let off some steam, are unlikely to assemble in large numbers again. An enormous security operation should succeed in preventing any more chaos. But the long-term picture is still troublesome. How will the Uighurs and the Han Chinese resolve their differences?
The Chinese authorities have taken the first step, arresting 13 people in Guangdong in connection with the factory killings which proved the catalyst for the riots. But that’s unlikely to satisfy the Uighur population, which has been fed ugly and wild rumours of mass rapes and butchery.
In addition, China’s refusal to admit that Uighurs have a legitimate complaint - that they are economically disenfranchised and discriminated against - will hinder any reconciliation.
The Chinese believe that Uighurs get an easy ride from police and are allowed to get away with petty crime. They also worry about policies that allow Uighurs to carry knives and threaten hardworking Han Chinese. This needs to change. Uighurs and other ethnic minorities should be subject to the same laws as everyone else in China.
However, the complaints of the Uighurs are far more serious. They are restricted from worshipping freely, from free movement (their passports are often held by the police and visas are difficult to obtain) and they are clearly not benefitting from the economic prosperity of their province.
When I was last in Kashgar, last year, I asked a former colleague who has since departed China, what the fundamental problem between Han Chinese and Uighurs was. “There’s a total lack of respect for Uighurs,” was his reply. It is difficult to imagine that there will be a change, and the hatred on both sides will run deep in Urumqi long after security is re-imposed.
China may even be succeeding in turning the Muslim Uighurs, who have traditionally been enamoured with Western values and culture, towards the anger and disenfranchisement felt by the fundamentalists just over the border in Pakistan and Afghanistan. These riots have been a watershed moment for Han and Uighur relations, and I fear that more trouble lies ahead.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:38 | 显示全部楼层
28l的连接有问题。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 09:56 | 显示全部楼层
西方的媒体并不都是欧美政府的喉舌, 但是为了商业利益,他们放弃了真实客观的职业操守和作为人的良心!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 10:02 | 显示全部楼层
很公正的一篇文章, 在外国能见这种文章 真的是很吃惊的说。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 10:03 | 显示全部楼层
这样的文章只能出现在博客,不会出现在报纸,原因就一个:政治不正确。
silencer 发表于 2009-7-11 02:28


正是我想说的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 10:30 | 显示全部楼层
烤~!我还以为哪一级的领导呢! 小样儿
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 13:33 | 显示全部楼层
很高兴看到西方传媒的良心尚有几丝未泯!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 13:34 | 显示全部楼层
这样的文章只能出现在博客,不会出现在报纸,原因就一个:政治不正确。
silencer 发表于 2009-7-11 02:28


俺觉得你说到点子上了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 13:45 | 显示全部楼层
这样的博文,貌似不太可能出现在西方主流媒体中
大概过不了总编那关吧
这就是西方的新闻自由——编辑的自由!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 14:16 | 显示全部楼层
西方的媒体并不都是欧美政府的喉舌, 其中不乏真实客观有职业操守和良心的!
SteelMask 发表于 2009-7-11 02:20

可惜这种人在西方舆论世界的空间微乎其微,特别是对上中国的时候,政治正确才是第一位的~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 14:20 | 显示全部楼层
英国电讯报继任的驻中国记者Malcolm Moore 的博客文章,
他承认在前一篇新闻里头给予热比娅过高的评价, 点出死者多数是汉人,承认一开始就判断受害者是维族是错误的。并且称赞中国防暴警察。

http://blogs.telegraph ...
rlsrls08 发表于 2009-7-11 09:36


他承认有问题的"前一篇新闻"刊登在报纸的重要地方广为流传,而他之后承认错误进行纠正的却只能在博客,我该怎么看英国电讯报和这位记者啊~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-7-11 14:23 | 显示全部楼层
其实那些记者都清楚新疆发生了什么,不过为了政治正确,他们不能那样写发表到报纸上而已
大家都混口饭吃,不容易
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
发表于 2009-7-11 14:28 | 显示全部楼层
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-17 11:50 , Processed in 0.033845 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表