History isn't rubber cement

ivy001

History isn't rubber cementRecently, a number of Western media reports on China's Tibet in the event of violence, so often the historical background on Tibet: "Before 1950 Tibet is an independent country", and "Tibet in 1951 was China's formal annexation" or "Tibet in China prior to the invasion enjoyed de facto independence."

These completely wrong "historical presentation" is the real history of betrayal and disregard, and is not aware of the history of Tibet Western ordinary readers malicious misleading.

In fact, Tibet has never been an independent country, the world has never been any recognition of a country's government over Tibet as an independent state. Since the 13th century, Tibet formally into the territory of China, the central government, Tibet has been under the direct control of an administrative region.

"CIA's secret war in Tibet," a book author Kenneth • Kangboyi recently said that the CIA has strongly cover up its own support Tibet rebels, the defection of the solicitation dl lamas covert operations, it is precisely because the United States Government and Tibet has never been non-existent diplomatic relations between the two countries. Kangboyi in his book disclosed, the United States Government until the summer before 1949 have changed the idea of the Tibet issue positions, but in December 1949, the United States Secretary of State Aiaixun still refuses to support the views of Tibet to join the United Nations, to continue to recognize Tibet as Chinese territory part. After the peaceful liberation of Tibet, some in the west began clamoring about the "Tibet is an independent country" strange is obviously driven by ulterior motives.

History is not rubber mud, can not tolerate arbitrary fabrication. Neglect the facts, irresponsible media being spurned by the end, the conscience of the media should shoulder the responsibility, but also true to history.

ivy001

　　最近一段时间以来，一些西方媒体在集中报道发生在中国西藏的暴力事件时，往往这样介绍西藏的历史背景：“1950年之前西藏是一个独立国家”、“西藏在1951年被中国正式吞并”或者“西藏在中国入侵前享有事实上的独立”。
　　
　　这些完全错误的“历史介绍”是对历史真实的背叛与无视，是对不了解西藏历史的西方普通读者的恶意误导。
　　
　　事实上，西藏从来就不是一个独立国家，世界上从未有任何一个国家的政府承认过西藏是一个独立国家。自13世纪西藏正式归入中国版图后，西藏就一直是中央政府直接治理下的一个行政区域。
　　
　　《中情局在西藏的秘密战争》一书的作者肯尼思•康博伊近日表示，美国中情局之所以极力掩盖自己扶植西藏叛乱分子、劝诱dl喇嘛叛逃的秘密行动，正是因为美国政府和西藏从来不存在国与国之间的外交关系。康博伊在书中透露，美国政府直到1949年夏才产生改变西藏问题立场的念头，但1949年12月，美国国务卿艾奇逊还是拒绝了支持西藏加入联合国的意见，继续承认西藏是中国领土的一部分。西藏和平解放后，西方某些人开始鼓噪“西藏是一个独立国家”的奇谈怪论，显然是别有用心的。
　　
　　历史不是橡皮泥，容不得随意捏造。不讲事实、不负责任的媒体终将遭人唾弃，有良知的媒体应该担负起责任，还历史以本来面目。

zhongy

It will be more convincing if you furnish the links on the internet (especially the links to the history of Tibet on wikipedia).