四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 2444|回复: 10

【2010年2月4日 德国外交政策网】主权的终结(德国外交策略报告)

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-4-2 13:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 zhongdong_wang 于 2010-4-2 14:49 编辑

【中文标题】主权的终结
【原文标题】The End of Sovereignty
【登载媒体】German-Foreign-policy.com
【来源地址】
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56307
【翻译人员】Zhongdong_Wang
【翻译方式】天然智能生物人类手工翻译
【网站声明】本翻译供Anti-CNN使用,未经AC或译者许可,不得转载。
【库文链接】
http://bbs.m4.cn/thread-223489-1-2.html
【译文内容】

主权的终结一


伦敦/柏林/雅典(独家报道)——德国政府顾问们正在不懈地共同努力,消除不列颠国家中对欧盟持怀疑态度人士的政治作用。正如“德国国际和安全事务学会(SWP)”最近出版的一份文件说明的那样,不列颠保守党的态度将会具有“帮助确定欧盟未来作用范围的决定性影响”,因为,由里斯本协议生效所开启的雄心勃勃的欧盟外交政策制定能力,将在一定程度上依靠伦敦方面的合作。期待定于五月举行的大选会带来(不列颠)政府的变更,由工党变成保守党。作为一位灵活的“欧洲实用主义者”保守党主席,出于党派内部力量对抗的缘故现在采取怀疑欧洲的姿态,但是他是可以用来反对党派内的批判欧盟派的。欧盟怀疑主义的主要理由是害怕国家主权的丧失。从围绕希腊国家债务的争论上可以看出,这不是不合理的担忧。德国总理已经在威胁需要掂量,雅典是否会根据需要甚至违背雅典议会意愿地在希腊强制执行一项紧缩预算。

全球化设计的

根据“德国国际和安全事务学会(SWP)”最近一份文件,排除不列颠政治经济的重要因素,如果没有别的理由,伦敦必须更牢固地融入欧盟外交政策。作者的解释是“大不列颠,作为欧盟第二大经济王国,有伦敦作为国际金融中心”肯定不容被忽视“因为它的外交和安全政策是以全球为着眼点设计的。”因为联合王国出了名的欧盟怀疑主义,欧洲大陆各国对伦敦的“关注很少”。这是一个错误。欧盟成员理所当然应该在里斯本协议生效后坚持要求不列颠政府对布鲁塞尔作出严格承诺。必须做出努力对保守派产生影响,因为他们可能会在春季赢得议会选举。

欧盟实用主义

正因为对欧盟的批判势力越来越受到欢迎,所以SWP形容当前保守党内部的发展形势为“严峻的。”“新一代的保守派议会成员们将进一步加强欧盟怀疑主义阵营。”正因如此,保守党迟早会有寻求与欧盟更紧密融合的需要。要取得和当前该政党领导人的合作,大卫卡梅隆是可以考虑的人选。到现在为止,他的那些对欧盟持怀疑论调的声明已经“基本上不在国内党派政权斗争考虑范围之中了,”因此,他自己反而更趋向于“保守的欧盟实用主义”了。从他为里斯本协议主持公民投票时不受支持的情况就已经很能说明问题了。SWP作者们提示,按照这种“保守的欧盟实用主义”,卡梅隆可能会“运用他的政党领导职位,对那些(欧盟怀疑论)普通成员施加压力。”当然,卡梅隆先前“和他自己政党内强硬派清算的失败”甚至等于“向那些十足的乐观主义者发出了一个信号,那就是仍然有很多工作要做。”不过,付出努力继续让欧盟怀疑派靠边站是值得的。

具有建设性的潜在因素

根据SWP文件,各种外部环境因素的影响会有利于实现这个计划。这份文件指出,自从今年保守党脱离欧洲人民党成立新的集团(“欧洲保守改良派”)以来,保守党影响欧洲议会的潜在能力已经被削弱了。作者们还认为,对大不列颠有重要作用的美国政府,在奥巴马政体之下,越来越觉得“不列颠在欧盟的重要作用是一种建设性的而不是导致冲突的潜在因素。”所以,对欧盟怀疑派采取行动是具备有利条件的。任何人都不能回避迫使欧盟批判派退隐的责任,因为即使工党出乎意外地仍然当政,“仍不能排除这种民族观点不会再露头角”,这种意味着欧盟怀疑倾向的情形。这就是无论如何必须在大不列颠内外发起一场围绕欧盟活动力扩张的“公开辩论”的原因。SWP作者们在论述如何实现此事的建议中,还没有给出明确答案,相当含混。

紧缩政策

不列颠欧盟怀疑论者主要是依然害怕,未来欧盟会夺取民族国家的主权并明目张胆地统治各成员国,甚至绕过选定的国家议会从国外控制大不列颠。这种担忧不是没有道理的,从最近希腊的发展情况就可以看出。希腊在巴黎银行的国家债务几乎已经达到了120%,已经是欧盟稳定和发展条约所允许的两倍。一些欧盟国家,包括德国,正在对雅典强烈施加压力不惜任何代价降低债务水平。这种要求是否符合情理,还是一个值得争论的事情。卢森堡首相让克洛德容克认为“这种被某种东西渲染了认为好像希腊已经濒临国家破产的观点,和我观察的结果背道而驰。”另一方面,德国联邦银行总裁阿克瑟尔微博,要求雅典强制执行一项严格的紧缩政策,这项政策也会导致大幅度消减工资。

仍然独立

德国总理要求布鲁塞尔公约应该通过新的权限,允许为了这类情况介入国家主权的核心部分。比如说,如果选举产生的议会拒绝实行实质性的工资削减,布鲁塞尔公约必须有权力违背意愿强制进行削减。安吉拉马克尔注意到“国家议会是不可能让事情强行实施的,”并要求“我们不得不讨论这类问题”。希腊总理乔治帕潘德里欧已经预见到了这种特别是影响到小型欧洲国家并把这些国家实质上直接置于欧盟尤其像德国这样绝对支配力量下的主权干涉。就帕潘德里欧来说,从1974年起经由对雅典施加的外部压力以不惜任何代价的方式削降低债务水平,希腊主权已经首度处于威胁之下。1974年希腊的军事独裁政治由议会民主体制取代。帕潘德里欧另外还说,雅典本身必须制定柏林和其他方面要求的削减措施。这是“保证希腊不失去独立性的唯一途径。”

主权的终结二

雅典/柏林(独家报道)——欧洲联盟已经屈服于德国的要求,空前地强行削减希腊国家预算,导致了大量失业,薪金降低和高额的税收增长。这出自于柏林对希腊的预算赤字会导致严重危机并给欧盟带来沉重负担的恐惧。商业界甚至还猜测欧洲货币联盟会因此终结。希腊政府现在必须每二三个月向布鲁塞尔汇报情况,出示证据表明希腊已经在国家开支上采取了严格的削减措施。柏林拒绝通过国际货币基金组织(IMF)提供援助,从而经常对非欧洲国家采取强制措施。因为国际货币基金组织通过提供援助会向在法兰克福的欧洲中央银行提出条件。柏林要求雅典采取严格紧缩措施,却仍然强迫希腊购买昂贵的战机。本周初在雅典,德国外长坚决要求希腊人购买德国哈尔堡穆斯产的“欧洲战士”喷气机。柏林的紧缩命令很有争议。一位诺贝尔经济学得奖者谴责德国政府为“赤字崇拜主义”,并预言这种措施会最终失去作用。

命令

欧洲联盟对希腊国家预算强迫执行空前的紧缩措施。正如欧洲委员会昨天在布鲁塞尔宣布的那样,到2012年为止,雅典必须将预算赤字从国民生产总值(GDP)的12.7%削减到2.8%。1997年在德国坚持下采用的“欧洲稳定条约”,允许的最高赤字是3%。包括德国在内的一些欧盟国家都违反了这个规定,德国的赤字今年甚至可能达到6%。希腊现在起会成为被迫削减国家预算的第一个国家。希腊政府必须每二三个月向布鲁塞尔汇报,出示证据表明按照命令在采取紧缩措施了。这些措施包括政府雇员的缩减、降低薪水和提高税收,都是极其过分的。驻地美国的金融研究公司高频经济公司预言希腊的失业率可能会从现在的9.3%上升到16%。

出口业的压路机

实际上,希腊债务激增并不只是由于全球经济危机,还是经济关系不断变化的体现。根据商业出版界的文章说,过去几年中欧洲地区各国之间已经出现了“值得注意的经济二极分化”发展趋势。因此,尤其是葡萄牙、意大利、希腊和西班牙(这些国家也被称为“PIGS国家”)这些南部欧洲国家,大部分的团体收益都被用于提高工资,德国已经实行了一项严厉压低工资的政策为德国公司创造有利条件。有解释称,由于德国“雇工大军薪水低水平增长,使得德国的欧洲竞争对手们在出口业上也受到了沉重碾压”。在加入欧盟以前,抵抗国内货币紧缩还有可能实现。但是“在一个共同货币王国里,没有任何防御力可以应对单个劳动力费用下降和生产力提升带来的不利影响”。这就是这些“PIGS国家”之所以经常账目陷入“很深的赤字”的原因。因为德国用出口收益可以抵消在其他经济领域缺乏防御能力导致的副作用,德国是“这个统一货币体系的赢家和受益人”。

欧元

但是,这也正是实际上一些专家们判断欧元危在旦夕的原因。欧元地区国家之间内部的经济差异滋养了他们经济政策利益之间的分歧。这不仅导致了德国和法国(参看german-foreign-policy.com的报道)之间的严重矛盾,还导致了整个货币联盟“面临失去控制和欧元濒临灭亡的风险”,波恩大学一位货币专家这样警告说。“如果国家之间这种被强行纳入到该体系中的经济分歧越来越明显,那么统一的货币体系是不会发挥作用的”,这家德国商业出版社在提议拯救能使德国获益良多的欧盟时写道,这些“PIGS国家”应该命令他们在政府开支上有显著的削减,就像欧盟委员会现在对希腊进行的那样。现在欧盟委员会的命令,作为一种即成的事实,是对德国联邦银行和总理的一种屈从。回顾2009年,德国总理坚持的就是这些措施。

军火工业

值得注意的是尽管柏林要求希腊采取显著的紧缩措施,却反对向雅典当局提供财政援助,而与此同时还要求希腊购买昂贵的德国军火。希望获取国际货币基金组织(IMF)信用贷款来解决希腊金融问题的审议也被德国政府很唐突地拒绝了。IMF信贷是有附带条件的并因此会对法兰克福的欧洲央行工作采取必须的限制。而德国政府通常希望第三方国家而不是德国本身来承受这种限制。同时,柏林敦促雅典购买总部位于哈尔堡穆斯的军火公司生产的欧洲战士。德国力图出售这种价格昂贵的战斗机给国外客户并以此增加欧洲军火工业的盈利,这种行为也导致了去年的激烈争论(参看german-foreign-policy.com报道内容[10])。在本周初的雅典访问期间,德国外长要求希腊选择欧洲战士而无视希腊的财政困境。

非只希腊

商业界已经在警告,对希腊的制裁将会提供一个采取类似措施的先例,用来针对以葡萄牙和西班牙为例的其他国家。“欧洲地区的外围成员国家,像希腊、意大利、葡萄牙和西班牙这些国家,在预算赤字同时也在国家竞争力上遇到了巨大难题”,一位著名经济学者近期公开这样宣布。事实上,柏林的低工资政策不仅仅影响了希腊。与此同时葡萄牙也被迫采取紧缩措施。

拜物教徒

2001年诺贝尔经济学奖桂冠得主约瑟夫史蒂格利茨强烈地批评了强加给雅典的这项紧缩命令。柏林和布鲁塞尔强加的这些措施,完全无视民主选举出来的雅典政府自身的意图,按照施蒂尔里茨的说法相当可能会阻碍增长、降低税收和增加预算赤字。这个经济学者解释说,相类似的计划在东亚根本没有发挥作用,而且在爱尔兰也面临会失败的威胁。“在欧盟有一些人信奉赤字崇拜主义,并从发表强硬言论中获得某种慰藉”,施蒂尔里茨总结道。施蒂尔里茨的话很明显是在暗示欧盟的霸权力量——德国。

主权的终结三

雅典/柏林(独家报道)——纵观希腊金融危机,柏林的政府顾问们正在考虑针对欧盟成员国国家主权的新的限制措施。由于对希腊局势的控制处于困境之中,德国国际和安全事务学会(SWP)写了一份近期分析报告认为有必要讨论“是否并且如何能够(在发生问题前)更早地对国家财政政策采取激烈行动”。昨天,雅典政府同意了布鲁塞尔对所支付工资进行新一轮削减和增加更多税收的要求,但是这些激烈措施是否足以使德国从不得不向希腊提供财政援助的窘境中摆脱出来,还是个未知数。柏林已经开始在权衡是否选择让那个国家(译注:希腊)破产,其后果很有可能是和去年通用汽车倒闭的那些情形相比“只是略微严重一些”,SWP这样写道。在希腊,从某时期开始,已经出现了对德国经济支配作用的抗议行动。媒体警告说“德国人可能会绝对控制”希腊的国家预算。

德国周:性命攸关的一周

在雅典,人们正在期盼着今后几天内涉及到解决财政危机的重大决定。因为这周希腊和德国政府间的两次高层会议,希腊媒体已经在谈论“德国周”,而且甚至已经是在谈论“性命攸关的一周”。就在上周五,德意志银行总裁约瑟夫阿克曼,已经在雅典和希腊总理乔治帕潘德里欧就危机问题进行了讨论。德意志银行一月份已经向希腊政府就国债问题提出过建议。下周五,帕潘德里欧总理将在柏林拜访德国总理。与德国总理的会晤将是至关重要的。

一个范例

德国对希腊的大量压力还不算怎么过分,因为德国各银行正处于危急之中。2009年9月底,希腊亏欠德国信贷机构430亿美元。专家们认为如果国家破产从而导致这些损失,是可以承受的。这只是德国对外信贷3万5千亿美元中的大约1.2%。作为一个例子,如果西班牙遭受金融破产的话,将会造成比这严重得多的问题。西班牙亏欠德国银行2400亿美元。西班牙是继希腊和葡萄牙之后,会被布鲁塞尔勒令降低国家预算赤字的第三个候选人。在欧盟的支持下,柏林坚持要求雅典采取激烈紧缩措施,应该看作是为马德里采取相同步骤避免西班牙债务膨胀(并因此对德国信贷构成威胁)的一个范例。

低薪政策

但首要的事情是,德国-欧盟的削减命令应该是解决一个基本问题。在过去几年中,德国采用毫不让步的低薪政策以允许出口猛增的做法,取得了对欧洲竞争对手的重大优势;南方欧洲国家的开支也是如此,这些国家与德国的外贸赤字已经显著上升。(参看german-foreign-policy.com报道[4])希腊对德国的外贸赤字,举例来说,从2006年的53亿欧元上升到了2008年的63亿欧元还多。为了停止希腊债务的盘旋上升,欧元区“这种令人瞠目的竞争中两极分化”必须得到消除,柏林SWP写道。但以德国模式的低薪政策的强制执行(正如现在实行的那样)将是不够的,SWP这样预言道。不过,柏林政府顾问们并未就需要采取那些补充措施达成一致。

国家破产

最近有一项提议,旨在刺激希腊经济,或许也有可能刺激其他“衰微国家”经济,认为要加强对雅典或者增补进口的援助。这或许要以进一步限制各代表国家国家主权的方式才能做到。SWP要求“讨论是否及如何才能更成熟地预先对国家财政政策采取激烈行动”。一些政府顾问们反对这样的程序。有些人说以一种可能是“不完全成熟且长期持续的”方式对希腊实行一揽子拯救计划,会越来越导致欧共体的衰弱,这是在任何情况下都必须避免的。如果雅典破产,那么“将告诉我们这样一个教训,欧元区一飞冲天的赤字,不是靠获取暴利能够战胜的。这甚至会更增强欧元的外汇价值”。希腊的破产会导致的“结果或许只是,比如说比2009年世界最大汽车制造商通用汽车的破产稍微严重点”。预防破产将会证明是“更危险的代价”。

置于控制之下

雅典既不能忽视柏林对希腊未来的考虑又不能忽视眼下德国媒体对希腊的反对运动。德国不仅是欧盟最强的力量,还是希腊最大的货品供应者,一如德国还是希腊的最大外国投资者一样。希腊国内民众已经复萌反对德国控制的抗议活动,尤其因为(德国)在希腊的纳粹恐怖行动至今被人们记忆犹新。2008年当德国Telekom寻求收购希腊OTE通讯公司的时候,引发了强烈的罢工风波,因为雇员们担心那些像现在这样在德国的压力下被强加的通过希腊失业和减薪采取的措施。OTE是希腊最大的企业,现在30%为德国所拥有。此外,还因为现在德意志银行对雅典政府的“劝说活动”,希腊媒体警示了德国对希腊的控制,尤其重要的是,一种可以预见的“德国对希腊财政部决定和计划的绝对控制”。这类控制只不过是欧盟在柏林的坚持下,现在已经强加于希腊财政问题的,对国家主权大范围限制的结果。(参看german-foreign-policy.com报道[10])

译后说明:
1、原文中提示参考的条目,这里有些没有翻译,有兴趣的可以点击原文链接中的相应链接查看。
2、个别语词翻译,可能理解上会有出入,忘了具体在哪里了,希望发现的人能帮助指出一下。
3、本文对billion一词一律采用的是大陆系(即美、法)解释含义,用的是10亿为单位,或许会和海洋系(英德之类万亿为单位)有出入。但,鉴于文中也使用了美元计算,所以采用大陆系含义,如有出入也请指出一下。

4、由于原文比较长,为了让大家能够连贯通顺地看完译文,所以这次翻译我将中文和原文分开,分别作为一大段内容。在这里也和大家说明一下。

评分

1

查看全部评分

 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-2 13:50 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 下个月 于 2010-4-2 15:46 编辑

原文内容:
      The End of Sovereignty-

      2009/12/14
LONDON/BERLIN/ATHENS (Own report) - German government advisors are insisting on concerted efforts to politically neutralize British EU-skeptics. As explained in a recent paper published by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), the British Conservatives' attitude will have a "decisive influence on helping to set the EU's future radius of action," because the ambitious possibilities in EU foreign policy making, opened through the Lisbon Treaty's coming into force, will depend, to a certain extent, on London's cooperation. It is expected that the elections scheduled in May will bring a government change - from Labor to Conservative. The chairman of the conservatives, a flexible "Euro-pragmatist," is taking a Euro-skeptic position because of the balance of forces within his party, according to the authors of the SWP paper, but he can be brought to oppose his party's EU-critical wing. The main reason for British EU-skepticism is the fear of the loss of the country's sovereignty. This is not unjustified, as can be seen in the controversy around Greece's national debt. The German chancellor is threatening Athens that the EU needs to consider whether it should impose an austerity budget on Greece - if necessary, even against the will of the elected parliament in Athens.

Globally Designed

According to a recent paper published by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), London should be more firmly integrated into EU foreign policy, if for no other reason, than for Britain's political economic significance. The authors explain that "Great Britain, the second largest economic realm in the EU, with London being a hub of international finances" could definitely not be ignored "because of its globally designed foreign and security policy."[1] Because of the United Kingdom's well known EU-skepticism, continental European countries have paid "little attention" to London. That was a mistake. It would "behoove" EU members to insist on the British government's firm engagement for Brussels after the Lisbon Treaty takes effect. Attempts should be made to gain influence on the Conservatives, since they will probably win parliamentary elections in the spring.

EU-Pragmatism/

Because of the growing popularity of the EU-critical forces, the SWP describes the current development within the Conservative Party as "somber." "The new generation of the Conservative parliamentarians will further strengthen the EU-skeptical camp." Therefore it will "sooner or later" be necessary to seek a closer integration into the EU. To achieve cooperation with the current party leader, David Cameron, is not out of the question. Up to now, his EU-skeptical statements have "mainly been out of consideration of internal party power struggles," whereas he, himself, tends more toward "conservative EU-pragmatism." This has become clear already through his backing off from holding a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. The SWP authors suggest that on the basis of this sort of "conservative EU-pragmatism" Cameron could "use his party leadership position, to place the [EU-skeptical - gfp] rank and file under pressure." Of course Cameron's previous "failure to settle accounts with the hard-liners of his party sends a signal" even "to the dyed-in-wool optimists that there is still a lot of work to be done." But it is worth the effort to attempt to continue to marginalize the EU-skeptics.


Constructive Potential

According to the SWP document, various extraneous circumstances are advantageous to this project. The paper points out that the possibilities of the British Conservatives influencing the European Parliament have been "weakened" since they broke off from the European People's Party, forming a new group ("European Conservatives and Reformists") this year. The authors are also of the opinion that the US government, which is so important to Great Britain, is, under the Obama administration, increasingly seeing "Britain's significance within the EU as a constructive rather than a conflict potential." Therefore the conditions are not disadvantageous for taking action against the EU-skeptics. One cannot avoid the task of forcing the EU-critical circles into retreat, because even if Labor - against all expectations - does remain in government, it can "not be excluded that the national viewpoint, will not come to the fore" - meaning the EU-skeptical tendency. That is why, in any case, an "open debate" with and in Great Britain around the extension of EU activities must be initiated. The SWP authors' suggestions concerning how this should be done remain non-committal and rather ambiguous.

Austerity Policy8

The main reason for British EU-skepticism remains the fear that in the future the EU could usurp the sovereignty of the nation-states and blatantly rule the member states, even Great Britain from abroad, bypassing the elected national parliaments. That this fear is justifiable can be seen in the recent developments in Greece. Greece's national debt has reached about 120 percent of its BNP, which is twice what is allowed under the EU's Stability and Growth Pact. Several EU states, including Germany, are exerting strong pressure on Athens to reduce the level of debts at all costs. Whether this is a justified demand, is a matter of dispute. The Prime Minister of Luxemburg, Jean-Claude Juncker considers "the perspective being painted by some, as if Greece is on the brink of national bankruptcy, is at variance with my observations."[2] Axel Weber, President of the German Federal Bank, on the other hand, demands that Athens impose a rigid austerity policy, that would also drastically cut salaries。
Still Independent

Still Independent

The German chancellor is demanding that Brussels should be granted new rights of intervention into central areas of national sovereignty, for such cases. If, for example, an elected parliament refuses to enact substantial cuts in wages, Brussels must have the power to order these cuts against their will. "National parliaments do not like to have things imposed," observes Angela Merkel and demands "we have to discuss this type of problem."[4] The extent of this sort of intervention, particularly affecting the smaller EU nations, placing them under de facto direct control of the EU hegemonic powers, in particular Germany, has been anticipated by the Greek Prime Minister Giorgos Papandreou. According to Papandreou, the country's sovereignty is under threat for the first time since 1974, through the external pressure on Athens to reduce its level of debts at all costs. In 1974 the military dictatorship in Greece was replaced by a parliamentary democracy. Papandreou added that Athens itself must institute the reductions demanded by Berlin and others. This is "the only way to insure that Greece does not lose its independence."[5]



[1] Martin Kremer, Roderick Parkes: Großbritannien: "Being nice to a sceptic?" SWP-Aktuell 66, Dezember 2009
[2] EU macht Druck auf Griechenland; Handelsblatt 10.12.2009!
[3] Bundesbank fordert Griechenland zum Sparen auf; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 10.12.2009
[4] EU verweigert Griechenland Soforthilfe; Spiegel Online 10.12.2009
[5] Bundesbank fordert Griechenland zum Sparen auf; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 10.12.2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/563180
The End of Sovereignty (II)

       ATHENS/BERLIN (Own report) - The European Union has submitted to German demands, imposing unprecedented cuts in the Greek national budget, resulting in a large loss of jobs, cuts in wages and high increases in taxes. This was caused by Berlin's apprehension that Greece's budget deficit could lead to a serious crisis and burden the Euro. Business circles are even speculating about an end to the European monetary union. The Greek government must now report to Brussels every two - three months and show evidence it has made drastic cuts in its state expenditures. Berlin rejects financial aid from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that it often imposes on non-European countries. This aid would be linked to conditions on the European Central Bank in Frankfurt. The demand that Athens take drastic austerity measures does not stop Berlin from pressuring Greece to buy expensive warplanes. In Athens, the German foreign minister insisted, at the beginning of the week, that they acquire Eurofighter jets (made in Halbergmoos, Germany). Berlin's austerity dictate is very controversial. A Nobel Prize laureate in economics accuses the German government of "deficit fetishism" and predicts that the measures will peter out with no effect.

The Dictate



The European Union imposed unprecedented austerity measures on Greece's national budget. As the EU Commission announced in Brussels yesterday, by 2012, Athens must reduce its budgetary deficit from 12.7% of its gross domestic product (GDP) to 2.8%. The "Euro Stability Pact" adopted in 1997 at the insistence of Germany, provides for a maximum deficit of 3%. Several EU countries are in violation, including Germany, whose deficit could reach 6% this year. Greece will now become the first country to be forced to reduce its national budget. Its government must report to Brussels every two - three months with evidence that the dictated austerity measures are being applied. These include especially the scaling back of government employment, cutting wages and raising taxes - all excessively. The U.S.-based financial research company High Frequency Economics predicts a possible rise in Greece's jobless rate to 16%, from its current 9.3%.[1]

The Export Steamroller


In fact the Greek explosion in debts is due not only to the global economic crisis, but is also an expression of a continuous shift in economic relations. According to articles in the business press, there has been the development of "significant economic dichotomies" between the countries in the Euro Zone over the past few years. Whereas in the southern European countries, particularly in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain - also designated as the "PIGS countries" - larger portions of corporate revenues have been spent on salary raises, Germany had been practicing a policy of rigorous wage depression to create advantages for its companies.[2] One commentary explains that because the German "army of wage labor accepts a low-level growth in wages, the export steamroller is again bowling over its European rivals."[3] Before the Euro was introduced, it had been possible to resist the deflation of domestic currency. But "in a common monetary realm there is no defense against sinking unit labor costs and advancements in productivity." This is why the current accounts of the "PIGS countries" have slipped "deep in the red."[4] Because Germany, with its export revenues, can still offset the lack of defense possibilities in other economic sectors, it is "the winner and beneficiary of the common monetary system."[5]


The Euro
But this is exactly why some experts judge the Euro to be endangered. The economic differences within the Euro zone countries foster divergence in their economic political interests. This not only leads to serious contradictions between Germany and France (german-foreign-policy.com reported [6]), but the entire monetary union "is at risk of becoming ungovernable and the Euro endangered" warns a monetary expert at the University of Bonn.[7] "A common monetary system cannot function, if the economic chasm between the countries forced into the system becomes too wide" writes the German business press,[8] while proposing that, to save the Euro, which is so beneficial to Germany, the "PIGS countries" should be ordered to make dramatic cuts in their government spending, as the EU Commission is now imposing on Greece. The current dictate of the EU Commission is, as a matter of fact, a submission to the demands of the German Bundesbank and chancellor, who had insisted on these sorts of measures back in December 2009.[9]

The Armament Industry

It is noteworthy that Berlin is opposing financial aid for Athens in spite of the dramatic austerity measures, while, at the same time, demanding that Greece buys expensive German armament. Deliberations for solving the Greek financial problems through credits from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) were abruptly rejected by the German government. An IMF credit is linked to conditions and would entail restrictions on the work of the European Central Bank in Frankfort. This is something the German government usually expects from third countries but does not itself want to bear. At the same time, Berlin is pushing Athens to buy Eurofighters that are produced by an arms corporation with headquarters in Hallbergmoos (Bavaria). German efforts to sell the expensive fighter planes to customers abroad and increase the profits of the core European armament industry led to heavy controversy last year (german-foreign-policy.com reported [10]). During his visit to Athens, at the beginning of the week, the German foreign minister demanded that Greece opt for the Eurofighter in spite of its financial difficulties.[11]

Not only Greece

Business circles are warning that sanctions against Greece could serve as a precedent for similar measures against for example Portugal and Spain. "The peripheral countries of the Euro zone, such as Greece, Italy, Portugal or Spain, have large problems with budget deficits, but also with their competitiveness," a prominent economist recently declared. Indeed, Berlin's low wage policy affects not only Greece.[12] In the meantime Portugal was also forced to introduce austerity measures.

Fetishists

The laureate of the 2001 Nobel Prize in economics, Joseph Stiglitz, is strongly criticizing the austerity dictate being imposed by Berlin. Berlin and Brussels' imposition of these measures, in complete disregard of the intentions of the democratically elected government in Athens, could - according to Stiglitz - considerably retard growth, reduce tax revenues and raise the budget deficit. The economist explains that similar programs have not worked in East Asia and threaten to also fail in Ireland. "There are some people in the EU who believe in deficit fetishism and get a certain comfort from talking tough," concludes Stiglitz, obviously alluding to the EU hegemonic power - Germany.[13]


[1] Greece's Austerity Sparks a Warning; The Wall Street Journal 02.02.2010
[2] Euroland abgebrannt; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[3] Der wahre Teuro; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[4] Euroland abgebrannt; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[5] Der wahre Teuro; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[6] see also Zweite Liga and In the Advantage'
[7] Euroland abgebrannt; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[8] Der wahre Teuro; WirtschaftsWoche 18.01.2010
[9] see also The End of Sovereignty
[10] see also Die Eurofighter-Mafia
[11] Westerwelle vertraut Griechenland; Deutsche Welle 02.02.2010
[12] EU übernimmt Kontrolle über Griechenlands Finanzen; Spiegel Online 03.02.2010
[13] Greece's Austerity Sparks a Warning; The Wall Street Journal 02.02.2010
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/563258

The End of Sovereignty (III)


ATHENS/BERLIN (Own report) - In light of Greece's financial crisis, government advisors in Berlin are considering new limitations to EU member nations' sovereignty. Because of difficulties in bringing the situation in Greece under control, the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) wrote in a recent analysis that it should be discussed "whether and how it could be possible to take drastic action more precociously on national fiscal policies". Yesterday, the government in Athens consented to Brussels' new reductions in pay and more tax increases, but it is uncertain whether these drastic measures will suffice to keep Germany from having to provide Greece with financial aid. Berlin has begun weighing the option of letting that country go bankrupt, the consequences being probably "just a bit more serious" than those of last year's insolvency of General Motors, writes the SWP. In Greece, since some time, protests have been raised against German economic dominance. The media is warning that "the Germans could take absolute control" of the Greek national budget.


German Week: Fateful Week

In Athens significant decisions are being expected in the next few days concerning the handling of the financial crisis. Because of two high level meetings this week between the Greek and German governments, the Greek media has been speaking of a "German week" and even of a "fateful week".[1] Just last Friday, the director of the Deutsche Bank, Josef Ackermann, was in Athens to discuss the crisis with Greek Prime Minister Giorgos Papandreou. The Deutsche Bank had already given the Greek government advice on the national debt in January.[2] Next Friday, Prime Minister Papandreou will be visiting the German chancellor in Berlin. The meeting with the German chancellor is considered highly significant.

An Example

The massive German pressure on Athens is not so much because German banks are at risk. At the end of September 2009, Greece owes German credit institutions US $43 billion. Experts consider the threat of this loss, due to national bankruptcy, to be bearable. This is only about 1.2 percent of the US $3.5 trillion in total German foreign credits.[3] Spain, for example, would constitute a much larger problem should it suffer financial bankruptcy. Spain owes German banks US $240 billion. Spain is the third candidate, after Greece and Portugal, for a dictate from Brussels to lower its budget deficits. Berlin's insistence, with the support of the EU, on Athens taking drastic austerity measures is supposed to serve as an example for Madrid to take similar steps and prevent Spanish debts from becoming larger (and thereby becoming a risk for German credits).


Low Wage Policy

But above all, the German/EU reduction dictate is supposed to solve a basic problem. Over the past few years, Germany has obtained significant advantages over its European rivals with its intransigent low wage policy allowing a drastic increase in exports - also at the expense of the southern European countries, whose foreign trade deficit with Germany has significantly risen. (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[4]) Greece's foreign trade deficit toward Germany, for example, rose from 5.3 billion Euros in 2006 to more than 6.3 billion Euros in 2008. To stop the spiral of Greek debts, "the glaring dichotomy in competitiveness" within the Eurozone must be counteracted, writes the SWP in Berlin. The imposition of a German model low wage policy, as is now being applied, will not be sufficient, predicts the SWP.[5] But the Berlin government's advisors do not agree on which supplementary measures should be undertaken.

National Bankruptcy

One recent proposal is to stimulate Greece's economy - and possibly also the other economies of the "weak nations" - with enhanced financial aid to Athens or supplementary imports. This may possibly have to be done with further restrictions to national sovereignty of the respective countries. The SWP demands that "it be discussed whether and how it could be possible to take drastic action more precociously on national fiscal policies."[6] Some of the government advisors are opposed to such a procedure. Some say that a rescue package for Greece, would, on a "medium and long-term" basis, lead to a weakening of the Euro, which must be prevented, under all circumstances. If Athens goes bankrupt, then it is sure that "the lesson will be brought home, that skyrocketing deficits in the Euro zone, cannot be fought by minting money. This will even strengthen the foreign value of the Euro."[7] Greece's bankruptcy would have "consequences probably just a bit more serious than, for example, the insolvency of the world's largest car manufacturer, General Motors in 2009." Preventing bankruptcy could prove to be the "more dangerous alternative."

Under Control

Athens can neither ignore the debate in Berlin about Greece's future nor the current German media campaign against Greece. Germany is not only the strongest EU power; it is also Greece's largest commodity supplier, as well as one of its largest foreign investors. There have been recurring protests in the Greek population against German domination, especially since Nazi terror in Greece has not been forgotten. When the German Telekom sought to buy into the Greek OTE Telecommunications Company in 2008, there was a strong strike wave, because the employees feared measures similar to those being now imposed, under German pressure, throughout Greece - loss of employment and cuts in wages. OTE, one of the largest enterprises in the country, is now 30 percent German owned.[8] Also because of the current Deutsche Bank's "counseling activities" with the government in Athens, the Greek media is warning of an increase of German domination and, above all, of a foreseeable "absolute German control over decisions and plans of the Greek Ministry of Finance."[9] This sort of control would be nothing more than the sequel to the vast limitations in national sovereignty that the EU, under Berlin's insistence, has now imposed on Greece in financial questions. (german-foreign-policy.com reported.[10])


[1] Prinzip Hoffnung; Der Tagesspiegel 01.03.2010
[2] Ackermann berät griechische Regierung; faz.net 26.01.2010,
[3] Heribert Dieter: Die internationalen Finanzmärkte stellen die Eurozone auf die Probe; SWP-Aktuell 19, Februar 2010
[4] see also The End of Sovereignty (II) and Vor dem Sturm
[5], [6] Daniela Schwarzer: Griechenland enthüllt Schwäche der EWU; SWP-Aktuell 18, Februar 2010
[7] Heribert Dieter: Die internationalen Finanzmärkte stellen die Eurozone auf die Probe; SWP-Aktuell 19, Februar 2010
[8] see also Colonialist
[9] Prinzip Hoffnung; Der Tagesspiegel 01.03.2010
[10] see also The End of Sovereignty
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 15:58 | 显示全部楼层
感谢楼主的精彩翻译
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 17:35 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢翻译,辛苦了。德国的野心真不小啊!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 18:00 | 显示全部楼层
安吉拉马克尔?

说的是德国总理安吉拉·默克尔吧
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 21:48 | 显示全部楼层
希腊破产了想让德国帮忙,可是希腊人干的活比德国人还少,福利比德国还高,德国人当然不满了……
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 22:44 | 显示全部楼层
欧盟迟早是要解散的~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-2 23:34 | 显示全部楼层
安吉拉马克尔?

说的是德国总理安吉拉·默克尔吧
秋秋歌唱 发表于 2010-4-2 18:00


嗯,好像是的。其实我不怎么关心政治,这个人名我是根据德语读音翻译的。
呵呵,谢谢你了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-3 22:57 | 显示全部楼层
德国不在用纳粹的方式来吞并欧洲了,想换一种方式
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-4 11:51 | 显示全部楼层
德国不甘落后哦
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-4 12:26 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,正是
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:29 , Processed in 0.056243 second(s), 23 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表