四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 532|回复: 0

windows 7 home basic 64bit European Commission vs. Microsoft Who is being unreas

[复制链接]
发表于 2011-3-10 22:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Now we know yet another good reason Microsoft rolled out with outstanding fanfare final week its interoperability ideas. Not just was it hoping for another likelihood to claim openness all-around its Office Open XML document format, nevertheless it was also hoping to head off one more hefty antitrust good through the European Commission. February 27, it became obvious that Microsoft's work on the EC front was in vain: The EC announced it planned to cost Microsoft $ one.three billion for failing to comply with terms from EC's 2004 antitrust situation. The EC explained the brand new good ( on top with the $ 1.two billion it had by now charged Microsoft) was for failing to provide rivals access to its protocols at a affordable price, enabling them to make compatible alternatives. officials are still maintaining that last week's interoperability announcements - which incorporated giving many others 100 % free accessibility to protocols and lower service fees for licensing the patented ones - had next to nothing to complete with any actions or hints of actions on the part from the EC. The timing of previous week's announcements was sheerly coincidental, Microsoft officials are still stating. what Microsoft advised me late on February 22, via an e-mail interview. The answers are from an unnamed service spokesperson: Why did Microsoft make this announcement on February 21? Is Microsoft saying that it had been purely coincidental that it announced new interoperability measures a week previously the OOXML ballot-resolution meeting Geneva? Or was there anything happening about the European antitrust front that spurred these announcements? The timing of this announcement is driven by the proven fact that we know that our prospects, IT vendors and open supply communities would like to see this set of broad reaching modifications to our solutions and company practices applied when potential. The thorough set of things to do apply across six high volume programs, and can boost the openness of these solutions and drive better interoperability, possibility and option for builders, partners, buyers and competition. Microsoft yesterday claimed that it can give providers who want to license its patented IP / APIs / protocols a >
A: Its normally reduced than previously. Microsoft and Samba entered into a complex agreement in December to permit Samba's open source engineers accessibility to Microsoft APIs and protocols desired to create their goods interoperable. Samba paid ten,000 Euros (by way of a non-profit produced through the Program Freedom Law Middle) for this entry. Will Microsoft be renegotiating its agreement with Samba and / or giving Samba any bucks again as a result of these new interoperability agreements? PFIF (Protocol Freedom Details Basis,windows 7 home basic 64bit, the Software package Independence Law Middle organization), coupled with one other MCPP (Microsoft Communication Protocol System) and WSPP (Workgroup Server Protocol Plan) licensees,microsoft windows 7 key sale, will be contacted individually inside the in close proximity to long run to focus on their distinct position to deal with their needs. or not you believe that Microsoft is staying forthright about why it trotted out many its top rated execs final week (Microsoft says it absolutely was simply coincidental timing; present day EC announcement says numerous),office 2010 Standard x64 key, the query stays regardless of whether the EC is being sensible the organization all that time to clean up and publish the very first set of protocols (MCPP and WSPP), at a charge of had some substantial qualms in regards to the EC antitrust situation versus Microsoft,microsoft windows 7 ultimate, chiefly for the reason that I practically never felt the EC proved customers had been harmed by Microsoft's actions. It proved, as an alternative, that Microsoft's competition had been harmed. But I've to say I do agree with the EC that Microsoft was attempting to drag its feet approximately doable when it arrived to providing the promised protocols. Including insult to injuries,cheap windows 7 cd key, Microsoft acted like it manufactured previous week's announcements from the goodness of its heart, as a substitute of because of the desire it could stave off a second giant very good. your acquire? Who's becoming extra unreasonable here? The European Commissioner for Levels of competition Neelie Kroes or Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer & Co.?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-23 13:17 , Processed in 0.037585 second(s), 20 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表