【绿色科技传媒网111031】呼吸污染空气的70亿人

weater76

【中文标题】呼吸污染空气的70亿人

【原文标题】7 Billion People Breathing Bad Air, Most Denying Global Warming

【登载媒体】绿色科技传媒网

【来源地址】http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/7-billion-people-breathing-bad-air/

【译    者】 WilliamRUC

【翻译方式】   人工

【声    明】 欢迎转载，请务必注明译者和出处 bbs.m4.cn。

【译    文】

Forget global warming for now. Let's talk dirty air.
If you believe that human-induced global warming is a hoax designed to line the pockets of greedy scientists and Al Gore, it might be easier to acknowledge that fossil fuels are fouling the air.
Here's a chart from the Los Angeles Times that shows how China's Ministry of Environmental Protection interprets air quality versus those environmental alarmists at the U.S. Embassy. What Beijing calls "slightly polluted" qualifies as "hazardous" by the diplomats.
Dirty air might be a stronger agent for change than the threat of global warming.
According to PEW Research, in 2010, only 34 percent of Americans believed that "global warming is occurring mostly because of human activity." That's down from 50 percent in 2006.

　　忘掉全球变暖吧，让我们谈谈脏空气。
　　如果你相信人类导致全球边缘是贪婪的科学家与阿尔•戈尔制造的谎言，那么理解化石燃料污染空气也许更容易一些。
　　这里有一份来自《洛杉矶时报》的表格显示中国环境保护部与美国大使馆空气质量检测的比较。北京标注为“轻度污染”的时候被外交官们认为“极度危险”。



And Halloween 2011 marks the day that the world's population reached the seven-billion mark. That's seven billion people aspiring to an energy-intensive higher standard of living and facing the choice of basing their behavior on petroleum fuel and coal or renewable sources.
This video from NPR on global population says "it all depends on how we manage our food, water, and energy."
　　2011年的万圣节世界人口达到了70亿。这70亿人在更高的生活标准下消耗更多的能量，面临使用化石燃料与可再生能源的选择。
　　这段从NPR截取的关于世界人口的视频说道：“一切均取决于我们如何打理食物、水和能源。”

以下为评论
Neplusultra 10/31/11 1:27 PM
    I suppose the first graphic, comparing the Chinese pollution ratings to a Western source is akin to the Chinese Vs SolarWorld issue.
    I’ve heard that SolarWorld and the Western solar industry is just trumping up data because they can’t compete with the Chinese. It is because they are all fat and lazy with a skill set to make a he’ll of a advertisement for an overly expensive product.
    Yes, the Chinese are a real bellwether for accurate deployment of information as it pertains to their “perception” of themselves and their attempt to dominate the world.
    Please review graphic 1 again.
　　我认为第一张将中国与西方指数对比的表格类似于中国与太阳能世界公司的较量。
我听说太阳能世界和其他西方的太阳能开发公司因为无法与中国人竞争而提高数据标准。因为他们又胖又懒，没有能力卖出价格过高的产品。
　　是的，中国已毫无争议地成为了领头羊，并努力征服世界。
　　请仔细再看一遍第一张表。

ECD Fan
What are you talking about?! China doesn’t have any so-called “pollution” at all, or any other real environmental problems for that matter because there aren’t any lawsuits ..... right? I mean, that is what you use to determine whether social costs exist or not. C’mon get with the program, you’re slipping.
　　你在说什么啊？！中国没有所谓的污染，因为没有司法保护，也没有任何真正的环境问题。对吧？我的意思是你得想一下社会代价到底有没有好好想想吧。

mds 10/31/11 2:00 PM "
When directly in the air over an area yes, but brown cloud of pollution over China has been shown via satellite measurements to cause warming, similarly for pollution over S. Cal.  I would conjecture this means CO2 and other GW gases have greater effect overall.  Also, particulates have been found in snow on glaciers and at the poles in significant quatity where they definitely increase heat absorption from the sun and increase snow melt.  Less snow and ice means less solar reflection and more heat absorption from exposed ground or water.  (white snow reflects way better)  So does it cool the earth more or warm it more?
　　中国受污染的乌云已经可以通过卫星观测到，它导致了气候变暖。我认为二氧化碳和其他温室气体有更多的作用。在冰川积雪和两极地区可明显发现细颗粒物，毫无疑问他们在那里吸收了太阳的热量并加速积雪融化。更少的积雪和冰意味着更少的阳光反射，于是暴露的土地或水吸收了更多的热量（白雪反射能力能强）。因此你说废气排放让地球更冷了还是更热了呢？

壮汉小奶糖

呵呵呵，中国啊，大垃圾场。不是我说美国怎么样，但是至少出门不用戴口罩