四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ChineseHeart

气得哆嗦, 造假触目惊心!

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-4-5 23:52 | 显示全部楼层
真是欺负老外不懂汉字啊  我喷
发表于 2008-4-6 01:18 | 显示全部楼层
这是早以前的图片了,从这几件事可以很清楚的看清西方人的嘴脸.
发表于 2008-4-6 02:52 | 显示全部楼层
这是上个世纪的图片,我记得当时公审后枪毙的,在哪个省我忘了,反正绝对不是西藏。国内网站上好多保留当时死刑执行前图片。哎,我只能说美国人已经丧心病狂,就像狂犬病最后发作一样不受大脑控制。看来外国的普通百姓都是傻子,他们的政府说什么他们就相信什么。
发表于 2008-4-7 00:16 | 显示全部楼层
这些无耻的媒体已经到了狂犬病晚期了
发表于 2008-4-11 16:12 | 显示全部楼层
能不能把我的帖子合并到这里来?
http://bbs.m4.cn/forum.php?mod=v ... =page%3D1#pid116278
发表于 2008-4-11 16:17 | 显示全部楼层
偶真的已经出离愤怒了,中国网民太需要这样的网站来了解世界的真相了。
发表于 2008-4-11 16:22 | 显示全部楼层
现在youtube 上关于西藏的全是CNN的video,而很多原来反映真相的video却打不开了
CNN 报导居然说罗格严重关切西藏的情况,以证明他们的正义性却只放罗格的画面,不敢放罗格的声音。还说很多奥委会的委员后悔把奥运会举办权给了中国,但vidoe里却没有任何那些委员的画面和声音
不过youtube的速度真快,画面也非常清楚,看看我们央视网、看看我们的搜狐网的画面,简直没法比,我想这也是他们影响比我们大的重要原因之一吧。
发表于 2008-4-11 16:33 | 显示全部楼层
the female CNN reporter in beijing just hold some papers and told the audience how the Chinese media misleading Chinese, but as a representative of CNN in China, why didn' t she translate all the details reported by Chinese media, she is obvious an asian progeny, and she works in China, she should be able to read the Chinese papers, why didn't she tell the whole story to her honest audience? Don' t they want to listen to all voices? just let the audience judge by themselves!
发表于 2008-4-14 09:21 | 显示全部楼层
简直就是移花接木,歪曲事实。
发表于 2008-4-20 01:34 | 显示全部楼层
造假的这是哪对哪啊?这么公然嫁接,小心结出恶果
发表于 2008-4-22 05:59 | 显示全部楼层
The woman in that picture in fact was a very famous criminal in China who killed her husband and was executed in 1995. The case was so complicated that it was kinda huge in China in the 90s'.

Another truth is that the woman was an ethnic Han, not Tibetan, which can be told clearly from her appearance! Not to mention that her name was labeled on that board she wore and the name was by no means Tibetan.


Besides, the uniform that officers in the picture were wearing is a very old kind which certainly wasn't the uniform that Chinese officers wore in 2005.

But how did the magazine and some other websites perceive the story? Look at the caption below the picture that the mountain-hiking magazine used. It reads, “...show execution of Tibetan prisoners on Jan 2005. The sign on this woman's neck reportedly accuses her of murder.”

So how many mistakes can there be in just two sentences?


  • This is not a Tibetan woman.
  • The execution took place in 1995 which is a decade before 2005.
  • The reporter can read the sign correctly for the woman's accusal while he/she cannot recognize the criminal's evidently non-Tibetan name.

I was shocked that a lie with that many rips can be published on a serious magazine. This is definitely NOT just some mistakes that the western media OCCASIONALLY make. They either jump into conclusions before they bother to use their journalists' brain to think and investigate, or they make lies up on purpose!! My western friends, do you or do you not wonder what kind of person would fabricate such a detailed story and spread it around the world?!

I know, even if we clear things up here, some westerners may still question China about the death penalty. I for one can tell that we Chinese also feel deeply uncomfortable with the scene and no one enjoys it. Besides, there has been great improvement over years. Now euthanasia has been adopted and in 2007 China reformed the way capital cases are handled, already leading to a substantial reduction in executions.

China is getting better in our own way. We truly welcome kind opinions and constructive criticism from other countries, however we do not need anybody to lecture us on what democracy or human rights are, especially when the the person who points fingers actually doesn't know the least of the truth. Arrogance and the sense of moral superiority have obviously made them ignorant. [ 本帖最后由 三宅一生 于 2008-4-22 06:36 编辑 ]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-9-23 05:35 , Processed in 0.039260 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表