四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1042|回复: 4

[翻译完毕] Lessons for the west from Asian capitalismBy Kishore Mahbubani

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-3-20 12:24 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 I'm_zhcn 于 2009-3-21 14:06 编辑

Lessons for the west from Asian capitalismBy Kishore Mahbubani
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a9c335e4-13f8-11de-9e32-0000779fd2ac.html

Published: March 18 2009 20:14 | Last updated: March 18 2009 20:14
英国金融时报:资本主义的亚洲经验(有引用高西庆2000年对衍生品的批评)

Asian elites have always looked at the world differently from western elites. And after this crisis is over, the gap in perspectives will widen. Asians will naturally view with caution any western advice on economics, particularly because most Asians believe that the crisis has only vindicated the Asian approach to capitalism.

To be accurate, there is more than one Asian approach. China’s economy is managed differently from India’s. Yet neither China nor India has lost faith in capitalism, because both have elites who well remember living with the alternatives. The Chinese well remember the disasters that followed from the Maoist centrally planned economy. The Indians well remember the slow “Hindu rate of growth” under Nehruvian socialism.

The benefits of the free market to Asia have been enormous: increased labour productivity, efficient use and deployment of national resources, a tremendous increase in economic wealth and, most importantly, hundreds of millions have been lifted out of absolute poverty. Just look at Chinese history through Chinese eyes. From 1842 to 1979, the Chinese experienced foreign occupation, civil wars, a Japanese invasion, a cultural revolution. But after Deng Xiaoping gradually instituted free market reforms, the Chinese people experienced the fastest increase so far in their standard of living.

The desire for an orderly society is deeply ingrained in the psyche of all Asians, which helps explain why virtually all Asian states hesitated to copy America in deregulating their financial markets. Instinctively, they felt government supervision remained critical. This was equally true in India’s democratic system and in China’s Communist party system. It is telling that, while Y.V. Reddy, India’s former central bank governor, was occasionally vilified by his country’s media for holding back on deregulation, he has now become a national hero. His stance saved India from the worst effects of this crisis. China was equally wary of deregulation. Indeed the Chinese leaders may have understood earlier than most that America was building a house of cards with its reckless creation of derivatives. Gao Xiqing, an adviser to Zhu Rongji, then Chinese premier, said in 2000 that “if you look at every one of these [derivative] products, they make sense. But in aggregate, they are bullshit. They are crap. They serve to cheat people.” Mr Gao said all this while Alan Greenspan, as chairman of the US Federal Reserve, was waxing eloquent about the economic value of derivatives.

Asian culture has been honed by centuries of hard experience, which explains why Asians save more. All Asian societies have memories of turbulent times. They know from experience the importance of preparing for the bad days that will follow the good. Most Asian friends of mine find it inconceivable that some Americans can live from pay cheque to pay cheque. “But what happens if you lose your job?” they ask.

The Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 may have been a blessing in disguise. The failure of the International Monetary Fund and western policies then confirmed in Asian minds that they had to create their own safety mechanisms for economic downturns. Thus began a decade-long exercise of accumulating foreign reserves. China’s went up from nearly $145bn at the end of 1998 to almost $2,000bn (€1,520bn, £1,430bn) at the end of 2008. India’s went up from $27.83bn in early 1998 to $315.6bn in June 2008. This enormous pool has helped to protect Asian societies as they hunker down for the storm.

And when this storm is over, we should not be surprised to discover that the greatest global believers in capitalism will be in Asia. But it will be an Asian mix of capitalism, not the western formula, that will become the dominant form of global capitalism, where the “invisible hand” of free markets will be balanced by the “visible hand” of good governance.

The Asian mix may have its own weaknesses. Asia is still underperforming in creativity and innovation. Corruption will remain a serious problem.

The Asian emphasis on the family unit may also be a mixed blessing. Many of Asia’s most successful entrepreneurs are keen to retain family control of the business. This enables them to take a long-term view. But the downside is nepotism and the lack of a deep culture of meritocracy.

On balance, the strengths of Asian capitalism are greater than the weaknesses. Within a decade Asians will have some of the largest free trade areas, including those between China and the Association of South East Asian Nations, the Japan-Asean FTA, and the Indian-Asean FTA that is likely to be set up. Recent history has taught Asians a valuable lesson: more trade leads to greater prosperity. In the Asian way – two steps forward, one step back – trade barriers will gradually come down. By the middle of the 21st century, intra-Asian trade will far surpass that of any other region.

Despite this, there will be no ideological trumpeting of the virtues of Asian capitalism. After their experiences of the past 100 years, Asians are wary of ideology. They prefer the simple, commonsense approach of learning from experience and they will heed the advice of Adam Smith, who said that prudence is “of all virtues that which is most useful to the individual”. It may also be helpful to nations.

The writer, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, has just published The New Asian Hemisphere: the  Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East. To join the debate, go to www.ft.com/capitalismblog

金融时报最近对资本主义的讨论很有意思。这篇文章鼓吹有亚洲特色的资本主义,虽然对中国有批评,但是认为利大于弊。还引用了高西庆2000年对衍生品的批评。有谁知道这段话的中文出处吗?

评分

1

查看全部评分

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-20 13:04 | 显示全部楼层
高西庆的出处应该在这里(英文),整个采访都很有意思:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/fallows-chinese-banker
译言有中文翻译:
http://www.yeeyan.com/articles/view/52383/19836

发现the atlantic采访他的作者也非常有意思(做过卡特的首席演讲撰稿人!)。最近写了好几篇关于中国的经济文章:http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/james_fallows
他的博客更新也非常勤快:
http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/

有空的话,真希望研究一下他的报道。要是AC以前贴过他的文章,哪位好心人可以发来看看。

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-20 15:20 | 显示全部楼层
谢谢各位斑竹转版和修改格式。我是新来的,多谢各位关照!
FT中文网好像还没有翻译这篇稿子。但是他们却翻了第二天刊登的反驳这篇文章部分观点的稿子,标题为《亚洲模式行不通》:
http://www.ftchinese.com/story.php?storyid=001025353&page=1

且不说论点如何,但就这种刊登不同观点的文章,然后讨论的风格(有点像左右互搏,呵呵),不得不佩服FT。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-20 20:08 | 显示全部楼层
已经有人翻译并且贴出来了。麻烦斑竹把两个帖子并成一个吧,谢谢!

http://bbs.m4.cn/thread-150241-1-1.html
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-20 20:56 | 显示全部楼层
我已经把相关内容转到翻译完成的那个帖子里去了。麻烦斑竹把这个帖子的标签改为翻译完毕吧。谢谢!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 06:34 , Processed in 1.751484 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表