四月青年社区

 找回密码
 注册会员

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

楼主: 空气稀薄

【散金条,征翻译】外国网民如何看待谷歌(google)或将撤离中国?

  [复制链接]
发表于 2010-1-14 14:17 | 显示全部楼层
全文最后一段的完整版
vivicat 发表于 2010-1-14 13:12


实际上还是这3句最应景。
世间行乐亦如此,古来万事东流水。别君去兮何时还?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 14:20 | 显示全部楼层
还是CNN的
Guest
why not simply do what we used to do and tax imports from China up the wazzu. Oh wait, they own us...damn. :(
为什么不能简单地我们以前做的,并且可以对中国商品征收关税呢。。。噢等等,它们是属于我们的。。。操,我太邪恶了:(
sugarmags : It's the same in Isreal. You can't walk down the street without choking on pollution. After a stroll in the city in China or Israel, you need to wash the dirt off your face. No censorship when it comes to emissions! yuk!
以色列和这边一样,你不屏住呼吸你就不能走在街上,因为这里污染太严重了。在中国或者以色列城市闲逛一会后,你需要洗洗脸上的污垢。当提到排放物的时候没有任何审查机构出来!笑死人了!
squidbilly :a least the Chinese let you know that they censor you here it just seems to disappear
他们中国人审查你的时候竭力地不让你知道他们是在审查你,好像它就这样消失了
sugarmags:At least it's just our comments that disappear and not us!
至少这仅仅是我们的评论不见了而不是我们
Guest
well, online scanning of emails & live chats and offline msgs is being done 'everywhere' in the name of 'homeland security' . Is google is ready to shut down their offices from there too??
而且,它们以“国家安全”为借口到处审查在线的电邮和在线交谈及离线消失。google准备关掉那边的机构了吗?

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 14:22 | 显示全部楼层
回复  cissyxchen

百度只是由中国人创建的,控股权并不在李彦宏、注册地并不在中国 ...
sntei 发表于 2010-1-14 12:13

明白。美国VC起步,注册在两个小岛上。就算100%美国护照控股,也改变不了它的本性,绝对不可能自己把天上的安全门之类的禁词放开的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 14:48 | 显示全部楼层
依旧是CNN的
This post is sarcasm for those of you that need a written disclaimer.
我给他们一个月的时间,蛤他们给你一个他们自已的盗版的Google,当你能偷窍的时候谁还需要真正的霹雳神偷。滚回中国吧!
这个贴子嘲笑这些需要书面放弃的人

Guest
HA! Google, brave defender of human rights, BAH! As if the Chinese govt's record wasn't enough to preclude doing business with them in the first place! HA! PR crap, period
哈哈!google,人权的勇敢的斗士,呸!就好像起初中国政府没有足够的证据妨碍和他们做生意一样!哈哈!公关废物,月经(译者注:这词应该这么译吧)
BigHungryJoe
This is just posturing. Google has been aiding and abetting the Great Firewall of China for years. Suddenly discovering that the more control and power you give to an authoritarian Communist nation, the more they abuse it can't really be a surprise to the self-proclaimed geniuses running that comp ...more
This is just posturing. Google has been aiding and abetting the Great Firewall of China for years. Suddenly discovering that the more control and power you give to an authoritarian Communist nation, the more they abuse it can't really be a surprise to the self-proclaimed geniuses running that company. It's still amazing to me that this allegedly "do no evil" country gets a pass on things -- like driving up your driveway in a car covered in 360-degree cameras -- that would result in blood in the streets if our government did it. They are not good actors and should not be treated as such.
这只是在摆姿势。google已经成为中国国家防火墙的从犯有几年了。突然发现更多的控制和力量你是给了一个共产专制的国家,他们责备再多,对于一个自称天才的公司也并不令人吃惊。对我来说令我吃惊的是这个自称“不作恶的”公司,这个国家竟给了通行证给他--就像开着辆带有360度的照相机行驶在车道上--如果我们的政府做了,这会导致满等是血的。他们不是个好演员,也不应受此待遇!

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 15:07 | 显示全部楼层
cornea503:Nothing but hot air..Too much money to be made in China for them to simply "pull out".
只不过说大话而已..他们在中国投了太多钱,对他们来说不可能仅仅简单“退出”就算了的
Guest
I agree, and what if the US decides for example which i am sure they won't, decide to get heavy in manufacturing again. What would happen to china's economy? I mean lord our oranges gonna start being chinese...
同意,假如美国决定了重新重视制造业(在我看来它们不会。),那中国的经济会发生什么?我的意思是我们的橙子给是中国人生产。。。
Guest
Calling China a communist country is kind of debatable too, as far as economics is concerned. Granted, yes, there is a risk of nationalization of foreign assets because the government is communist but on a microeconomic level the firms operate in a way very similar to a free market country.
中国是不是共产主义国家也是有争论的,就仅就其经济而言,算是吧。国有化外国资产是有危险的因为政府是共产党但是在个体经济层面公司运营的方式与自由市场国家很相似。

WHy should international company stay in China, if China refuse to join rest of the internaltional community? Google made the mistake to go along with chinese authorities, now Google is waking up, GOOD for them.

为什么国际公司必须呆在中国,如果中国拒绝国际公司?google犯了一个错误就是与中国官方打交道,现在google醒来了,对他们来说是件好事!

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 20:19 | 显示全部楼层
虽然我一直都用GOOGLE,而且只用GOOGLE,不过如果要走,就走吧.
雷曼都倒闭了,G00GLE也会有那么一天.
那他今天走,和将来倒闭走,对我没什么不同.
这个世界,我已经习惯了,周围习惯的东西,瞬间的消失.
没办法,变化太快
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 23:33 | 显示全部楼层
同关注,如果谷歌真的走了.也许就是我开始对共产党态度发生变化的时候.
skywing 发表于 2010-1-13 23:40


笑死人了,谷歌自己要走,你赖得着共产党吗?
按你的逻辑,共产党得求爷爷告奶奶地求着谷歌不走?
或者给谷歌特权,谷歌想怎么样就怎么样,共产党听谷歌的?
真不知道你的脑袋是不是被驴踢了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-14 23:40 | 显示全部楼层
★★CNN“Google vs. China: Free speech, finances or both?”,目前评论83条



2010-01-14_233645.png

链接:http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/01/13/google.china.analysis/index.html
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 03:21 | 显示全部楼层

我是来要金条的~~

Guest

personally I applaud google for its effort to collect knowledge, if they are scanning books in china. I mean come on... Ive gotten ripped on Ebay before, it that even something worth mentioning when you were the subject of an attack like this? I bet the Chinease govt. will allow uncensored results...
7 hours ago | Like (1) | Report abuse midlights

从个人角度来说,我感谢谷歌收集知识的努力,如果他们在中国扫描书的话。我的意思是,算了吧... 我以前也被易趣欺骗过,如果你是个像这样被(黑客)攻击的主体,那更值得说说吧?我猜中国政府会允许未经审查的结果的...
7小时前


midlights
To quote a related story..."Yahoo, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., closed its offices in China in 2005 when it sold its business there to the Alibaba Group. As part of that deal, Yahoo retains a 39 percent stake in Alibaba that represents one of Yahoo's most valuable assets."Google must set a better exa ...more
To quote a related story...

"Yahoo, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., closed its offices in China in 2005 when it sold its business there to the Alibaba Group. As part of that deal, Yahoo retains a 39 percent stake in Alibaba that represents one of Yahoo's most valuable assets."

Google must set a better example than this! less

15 hours ago | Like (1) | Report abuse

引用一个故事...“基地在加利福尼亚的阳光谷的雅虎与2005年关闭了他的中国办公室,它把它的商业卖给了阿里巴巴集团。作为交易的一部分,雅虎保留了在阿里巴巴百分之39的股票,这展示了雅虎最有价值的物质之一。”
谷歌必须树立一个比这个更好的榜样!至少
15小时前

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 04:38 | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# 空气稀薄
久违了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 06:56 | 显示全部楼层
6.Youssef51
NY, NY - 纽约市

More disgraceful behavior from the Chinese regime. The latest in a long, long history of violence, intimidation, all-around brutality and perfect disregard for basic human dignity.

Google should pull out of China. Completely. This would be a useful message to the rulers in Beijing. They would notice that not everyone is so cowardly and crazed with greed that they willingly put up with every imaginable rotten Chinese policy.

在一系列充满侵犯,威迫,残暴的行为后,这是近期中国政权的又一不光彩的行为。他们完美的忽略了人最基本的尊严。
谷歌应该马上完全的撤出中国。他们的行为对于北京的统治者来说将会是很有效的信息。他们(BJ统治者)会发现并不是每个人都是懦弱和爱钱如命的; 也并不是每个人都会承担中国的腐败政策的。


10.clmadson
Portland, Oregon - 俄勒冈州

Go Google!!! Our government may not be able to stand up to the Chinese and support and protect the rights of the Chinese people maybe Google has the guts.

为谷歌喝彩!!我们政府或许无法反抗中国和保护中国人民的人权,但是谷歌有这胆。


11.Jerry w
Along the left coast - 西海岸某处

Do you suppose that a massive cyber attack from Afghanistan would lead us to also pull out of our operations there?

Just askin....

你们认为如果阿富汗给我们来场网络攻击,能使我们把士兵从那调出来么?

问问而已。。。



17.hsh
nyc -  纽约市

What Google said does not make too much sense. Is there any relationship between this piece and the Google’s very recent apology for scanning Chinese works without permission? Let's see what will happen.

谷歌说的话并不合乎常理。谷歌这次的声明和最近他们抱歉私自扫描中国作品有没有关系呢? 拭目以待吧.


19.Rosemary Walsak
Wilmington, NC - 北卡罗拉纳州

Google needs to hold true to it's "threat" to pull out of its operations in China.
China is and has always been nothing but trouble. China is a deceitful, dishonest, and inhuman country.
It is unfortunate they basically own the USA. Shame on the United States Government's greed.
The USA is not as powerful as we think we are. We may even become "a third world" before it's over.

谷歌需要实现撤出中国的“威胁”。
中国从以前到现在一直都是麻烦。 中国是一个欺诈,不诚实而且不人道的国家。
很不幸他们基本上支配了美国。美国政府的贪婪使人羞愧。
美利坚合众国并不如我们以为的那么强大。在一切结束前,我们甚至都可能变成一个“第三世界国家”

29.Stephen
Windsor, Ontario, Canada -  加拿大


Nothing really new here. The Chinese play be their rules and nobody else's and frankly, my dear, they don't give a damn.

没啥新鲜事。中国人不按任何人的规矩做事,只按自己的。孩子们,事实是他们根本不在乎。




31.bbednarz
jersey city, new jersey - 新泽西州

...
..the company said, it would no longer agree to censor its search engine in China
.As an american that believes in FREEDOM OF SPPEECH -.- I would not and will not deal with GOOGLE or any form of that company that pretends to be American
THEY sold their soul for tha almighty dollar - that has become worthless because of companies such as itself


谷歌公司说,‘他不会继续同意在谷歌中国上的搜查审核’
作为一个相信“言论自由”的美国人 -.- 我现在将来都不会和谷歌或者任何化装成美国的公司有来往。
他们为了那万能的钱出卖了他们的灵魂 - 而像这样的公司行为也让他们变得分文不值。


47.Ray
Hong Kong - 香港


I hope Google moves out and gives up on the largest internet population in the world. China should not allow foreign companies to compete with homegrown companies in core technologies anyway. Zero competition for Baidu!

我希望谷歌可以搬出去并且放弃世界上最大的网络人口。 中国本来就不应该允许外国公司来和本土公司在核心技术上竞争。百度将无对手!





评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 08:05 | 显示全部楼层
我的翻译 得分了也~~

可爱的VIVI
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 09:28 | 显示全部楼层
这算不算一种炒作。真恶心呀。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 13:40 | 显示全部楼层
我还是比较同意13楼的意见
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 13:55 | 显示全部楼层
我看到的英文评论都是一边倒支持Google推出中国市场的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 14:00 | 显示全部楼层
说实话,我不希望google撤出中国,因为我们需要旁观者和批评者来督促Z****F,你看,我现在打个Z****F还需要这么费劲,如果没有了批评者,我想情况会更严重。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
另,我刚看了google,已经开放了所有敏感限制的词条搜索了,我觉得这很好,因为明白人不会因为他的一家之言而相信,不明白人,你越限制反而适得其反,不如让大家都说出来,理是越辩越明的么。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 14:08 | 显示全部楼层
再次强调,没有批评者的环境是可怕的!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 14:40 | 显示全部楼层
同关注,如果谷歌真的走了.也许就是我开始对共产党态度发生变化的时候.
skywing 发表于 2010-1-13 23:40



    你应该跟谷歌一起滚到美国去.....
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-1-15 16:34 | 显示全部楼层
回复 4# dnh7688


    商业也有商业的原则,如果你觉得商业只知道赚钱,违背道德 那么你又会开始批评商业无道德! 虽然是商业google有权利坚持正确的东西,做为搜索引擎他本身就是做到公平搜索,媒体本身是不应该本政治左右的 ,就和你说的商业和政治不能混为一谈!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|免责声明|四月网论坛 ( AC四月青年社区 京ICP备08009205号 备案号110108000634 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 12:57 , Processed in 0.059345 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表